Publikation:

The stability and modulation of if-then rules versus prospective planning in movement selection under dual-tasking conditions

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Stoll_2-1xen8tnlosr9k5.pdf
Stoll_2-1xen8tnlosr9k5.pdfGröße: 2.3 MBDownloads: 1

Datum

2025

Autor:innen

Stoll, Sarah
Wenzel, Anna
Hitzler, B.
Randerath, Jennifer

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Link zur Lizenz

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Gold
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Scientific Reports. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. 2025, 15(1), 1341. eISSN 2045-2322. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-81630-5

Zusammenfassung

Two approaches to movement selection, if-then rules versus prospective planning, were investigated. Studies have shown that the rule-based approach leads to more efficient movement selection than the plan-based approach, though the resulting movements are the same. This dual-tasking study investigates two hypotheses explaining this discrepancy: The efficiency hypothesis states that the rule-based approach to movement selection is more efficient, and its advantage over the plan-based approach increases under any kind of enhanced task demands. The dual-mechanisms hypothesis states that the two approaches to movement selection are based on distinct mechanisms and that they can be differentially affected by secondary tasks. Forty-eight participants selected a grip in order to comfortably rotate a dowel to a target position using the rule- or the plan-based approach. Four dual-tasking conditions were added: Identifying the activity underlying an object-interaction sound, identifying and categorizing the object underlying an object-interaction sound, identifying one of four words that does not match the others semantically, and solving calculations. The rule-based approach led to more efficient movement selection in most dual-tasking conditions. However, its advantage disappeared when the secondary task was to identify and categorize objects. These results strengthen the dual-mechanisms hypothesis, and possible factors distinguishing the approaches are discussed.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
150 Psychologie

Schlagwörter

Prospective planning, Implementation intentions, Dual-tasking, Movement selection

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690STOLL, Sarah, Anna WENZEL, B. HITZLER, Jennifer RANDERATH, 2025. The stability and modulation of if-then rules versus prospective planning in movement selection under dual-tasking conditions. In: Scientific Reports. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. 2025, 15(1), 1341. eISSN 2045-2322. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-81630-5
BibTex
@article{Stoll2025-01-08stabi-72020,
  title={The stability and modulation of if-then rules versus prospective planning in movement selection under dual-tasking conditions},
  year={2025},
  doi={10.1038/s41598-024-81630-5},
  number={1},
  volume={15},
  journal={Scientific Reports},
  author={Stoll, Sarah and Wenzel, Anna and Hitzler, B. and Randerath, Jennifer},
  note={Article Number: 1341}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/72020">
    <dcterms:issued>2025-01-08</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/72020"/>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/72020/1/Stoll_2-1xen8tnlosr9k5.pdf"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:title>The stability and modulation of if-then rules versus prospective planning in movement selection under dual-tasking conditions</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2025-01-23T07:46:44Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:contributor>Randerath, Jennifer</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:abstract>Two approaches to movement selection, if-then rules versus prospective planning, were investigated. Studies have shown that the rule-based approach leads to more efficient movement selection than the plan-based approach, though the resulting movements are the same. This dual-tasking study investigates two hypotheses explaining this discrepancy: The efficiency hypothesis states that the rule-based approach to movement selection is more efficient, and its advantage over the plan-based approach increases under any kind of enhanced task demands. The dual-mechanisms hypothesis states that the two approaches to movement selection are based on distinct mechanisms and that they can be differentially affected by secondary tasks. Forty-eight participants selected a grip in order to comfortably rotate a dowel to a target position using the rule- or the plan-based approach. Four dual-tasking conditions were added: Identifying the activity underlying an object-interaction sound, identifying and categorizing the object underlying an object-interaction sound, identifying one of four words that does not match the others semantically, and solving calculations. The rule-based approach led to more efficient movement selection in most dual-tasking conditions. However, its advantage disappeared when the secondary task was to identify and categorize objects. These results strengthen the dual-mechanisms hypothesis, and possible factors distinguishing the approaches are discussed.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:contributor>Stoll, Sarah</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Stoll, Sarah</dc:creator>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
    <dc:creator>Hitzler, B.</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Wenzel, Anna</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Hitzler, B.</dc:contributor>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Wenzel, Anna</dc:contributor>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dc:creator>Randerath, Jennifer</dc:creator>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/72020/1/Stoll_2-1xen8tnlosr9k5.pdf"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2025-01-23T07:46:44Z</dc:date>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Ja
Diese Publikation teilen