Publikation: Is consensus-seeking unique to humans? : A selective review of animal group decision-making and its implications for (human) social psychology
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
Recent research on animal behavior suggests that group decision-making may not be uniquely human. Based on Tinbergen’s (1963) “four questions,” this paper proposes that linking biological- and social-science approaches is important to a better understanding of human group decisions. Toward this end, we first review some recent findings on collective behavior by social insects (ants and honeybees in particular). We then argue that several fundamental processes (e.g., positive feedback, nonlinear responses to social frequency information, and use of quorums) commonly underlie human and non-human group decision-making under uncertainty, while key prerequisites for the emergence of collective intelligence may be more vulnerable to social nuances in human contexts. We sketch some future research directions to promote cross-fertilizations between the two fields.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
KAMEDA, Tatsuya, Thomas WISDOM, Wataru TOYOKAWA, Keigo INUKAI, 2012. Is consensus-seeking unique to humans? : A selective review of animal group decision-making and its implications for (human) social psychology. In: Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. Sage. 2012, 15(5), pp. 673-689. ISSN 1368-4302. eISSN 1461-7188. Available under: doi: 10.1177/1368430212451863BibTex
@article{Kameda2012conse-54072, year={2012}, doi={10.1177/1368430212451863}, title={Is consensus-seeking unique to humans? : A selective review of animal group decision-making and its implications for (human) social psychology}, number={5}, volume={15}, issn={1368-4302}, journal={Group Processes & Intergroup Relations}, pages={673--689}, author={Kameda, Tatsuya and Wisdom, Thomas and Toyokawa, Wataru and Inukai, Keigo} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/54072"> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-06-23T08:10:28Z</dc:date> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dcterms:title>Is consensus-seeking unique to humans? : A selective review of animal group decision-making and its implications for (human) social psychology</dcterms:title> <dc:contributor>Wisdom, Thomas</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Wisdom, Thomas</dc:creator> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dc:creator>Inukai, Keigo</dc:creator> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:creator>Toyokawa, Wataru</dc:creator> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dcterms:issued>2012</dcterms:issued> <dc:contributor>Kameda, Tatsuya</dc:contributor> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Recent research on animal behavior suggests that group decision-making may not be uniquely human. Based on Tinbergen’s (1963) “four questions,” this paper proposes that linking biological- and social-science approaches is important to a better understanding of human group decisions. Toward this end, we first review some recent findings on collective behavior by social insects (ants and honeybees in particular). We then argue that several fundamental processes (e.g., positive feedback, nonlinear responses to social frequency information, and use of quorums) commonly underlie human and non-human group decision-making under uncertainty, while key prerequisites for the emergence of collective intelligence may be more vulnerable to social nuances in human contexts. We sketch some future research directions to promote cross-fertilizations between the two fields.</dcterms:abstract> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-06-23T08:10:28Z</dcterms:available> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:contributor>Inukai, Keigo</dc:contributor> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/54072"/> <dc:creator>Kameda, Tatsuya</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Toyokawa, Wataru</dc:contributor> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>