Publikation:

Is consensus-seeking unique to humans? : A selective review of animal group decision-making and its implications for (human) social psychology

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

Datum

2012

Autor:innen

Kameda, Tatsuya
Wisdom, Thomas
Inukai, Keigo

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

URI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. Sage. 2012, 15(5), pp. 673-689. ISSN 1368-4302. eISSN 1461-7188. Available under: doi: 10.1177/1368430212451863

Zusammenfassung

Recent research on animal behavior suggests that group decision-making may not be uniquely human. Based on Tinbergen’s (1963) “four questions,” this paper proposes that linking biological- and social-science approaches is important to a better understanding of human group decisions. Toward this end, we first review some recent findings on collective behavior by social insects (ants and honeybees in particular). We then argue that several fundamental processes (e.g., positive feedback, nonlinear responses to social frequency information, and use of quorums) commonly underlie human and non-human group decision-making under uncertainty, while key prerequisites for the emergence of collective intelligence may be more vulnerable to social nuances in human contexts. We sketch some future research directions to promote cross-fertilizations between the two fields.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
150 Psychologie

Schlagwörter

group decision making, social insects, algorithms, adaptation

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690KAMEDA, Tatsuya, Thomas WISDOM, Wataru TOYOKAWA, Keigo INUKAI, 2012. Is consensus-seeking unique to humans? : A selective review of animal group decision-making and its implications for (human) social psychology. In: Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. Sage. 2012, 15(5), pp. 673-689. ISSN 1368-4302. eISSN 1461-7188. Available under: doi: 10.1177/1368430212451863
BibTex
@article{Kameda2012conse-54072,
  year={2012},
  doi={10.1177/1368430212451863},
  title={Is consensus-seeking unique to humans? : A selective review of animal group decision-making and its implications for (human) social psychology},
  number={5},
  volume={15},
  issn={1368-4302},
  journal={Group Processes & Intergroup Relations},
  pages={673--689},
  author={Kameda, Tatsuya and Wisdom, Thomas and Toyokawa, Wataru and Inukai, Keigo}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/54072">
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-06-23T08:10:28Z</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:title>Is consensus-seeking unique to humans? : A selective review of animal group decision-making and its implications for (human) social psychology</dcterms:title>
    <dc:contributor>Wisdom, Thomas</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Wisdom, Thomas</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dc:creator>Inukai, Keigo</dc:creator>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:creator>Toyokawa, Wataru</dc:creator>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2012</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:contributor>Kameda, Tatsuya</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Recent research on animal behavior suggests that group decision-making may not be uniquely human. Based on Tinbergen’s (1963) “four questions,” this paper proposes that linking biological- and social-science approaches is important to a better understanding of human group decisions. Toward this end, we first review some recent findings on collective behavior by social insects (ants and honeybees in particular). We then argue that several fundamental processes (e.g., positive feedback, nonlinear responses to social frequency information, and use of quorums) commonly underlie human and non-human group decision-making under uncertainty, while key prerequisites for the emergence of collective intelligence may be more vulnerable to social nuances in human contexts. We sketch some future research directions to promote cross-fertilizations between the two fields.</dcterms:abstract>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-06-23T08:10:28Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:contributor>Inukai, Keigo</dc:contributor>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/54072"/>
    <dc:creator>Kameda, Tatsuya</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Toyokawa, Wataru</dc:contributor>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Nein
Begutachtet
Ja
Diese Publikation teilen