Publikation:

European integration: Quo vadis? : A critical commentary on the PSPP judgment of the German Federal Constitutional Court of May 5, 2020

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

Datum

2021

Autor:innen

Basedow, Jürgen
Dietze, Jan
Griller, Stefan
Kellerbauer, Manuel
Klamert, Marcus
Malferrari, Luigi
Scharf, Tibor
Schnichels, Dominik
Tomkin, Jonathan

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

URI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

International Journal of Constitutional Law. Oxford University Press. 2021, 19(1), pp. 188-207. ISSN 1474-2640. eISSN 1474-2659. Available under: doi: 10.1093/icon/moab017

Zusammenfassung

In its judgment of May 5, 2020, the Second Senate of the German Constitutional Court qualified for the first time a judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU)—C-493/17 Weiss—as “arbitrary from an objective perspective” and declared the underlying European Central Bank (ECB) decisions regarding the Public Sector Purchase Programme (PSPP) to be ultra vires. It requested the German Government and the German Parliament to take steps against the PSPP in its current form and to ensure that the ECB conducts a proportionality assessment of its PSPP. The judgment also prohibits the German Central Bank from participating, after a grace period of three months, in the implementation and execution of the ECB decisions at issue, unless the ECB assesses and substantiates that the measures provided for in its decisions satisfy the principle of proportionality. The present article, which was written by academics, lawyers, and civil servants from five countries, casts a critical eye on the judgment of the German Constitutional Court. It identifies significant shortcomings from both a German constitutional and a European Union perspective.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
340 Recht

Schlagwörter

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690BASEDOW, Jürgen, Jan DIETZE, Stefan GRILLER, Manuel KELLERBAUER, Marcus KLAMERT, Luigi MALFERRARI, Tibor SCHARF, Dominik SCHNICHELS, Daniel THYM, Jonathan TOMKIN, 2021. European integration: Quo vadis? : A critical commentary on the PSPP judgment of the German Federal Constitutional Court of May 5, 2020. In: International Journal of Constitutional Law. Oxford University Press. 2021, 19(1), pp. 188-207. ISSN 1474-2640. eISSN 1474-2659. Available under: doi: 10.1093/icon/moab017
BibTex
@article{Basedow2021Europ-54728,
  year={2021},
  doi={10.1093/icon/moab017},
  title={European integration: Quo vadis? : A critical commentary on the PSPP judgment of the German Federal Constitutional Court of May 5, 2020},
  number={1},
  volume={19},
  issn={1474-2640},
  journal={International Journal of Constitutional Law},
  pages={188--207},
  author={Basedow, Jürgen and Dietze, Jan and Griller, Stefan and Kellerbauer, Manuel and Klamert, Marcus and Malferrari, Luigi and Scharf, Tibor and Schnichels, Dominik and Thym, Daniel and Tomkin, Jonathan}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/54728">
    <dc:contributor>Kellerbauer, Manuel</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Dietze, Jan</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-08-25T12:54:48Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-08-25T12:54:48Z</dc:date>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/44"/>
    <dc:contributor>Malferrari, Luigi</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:title>European integration: Quo vadis? : A critical commentary on the PSPP judgment of the German Federal Constitutional Court of May 5, 2020</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:issued>2021</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:creator>Schnichels, Dominik</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Scharf, Tibor</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Tomkin, Jonathan</dc:contributor>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>Scharf, Tibor</dc:creator>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/54728"/>
    <dc:contributor>Thym, Daniel</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">In its judgment of May 5, 2020, the Second Senate of the German Constitutional Court qualified for the first time a judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU)—C-493/17 Weiss—as “arbitrary from an objective perspective” and declared the underlying European Central Bank (ECB) decisions regarding the Public Sector Purchase Programme (PSPP) to be ultra vires. It requested the German Government and the German Parliament to take steps against the PSPP in its current form and to ensure that the ECB conducts a proportionality assessment of its PSPP. The judgment also prohibits the German Central Bank from participating, after a grace period of three months, in the implementation and execution of the ECB decisions at issue, unless the ECB assesses and substantiates that the measures provided for in its decisions satisfy the principle of proportionality. The present article, which was written by academics, lawyers, and civil servants from five countries, casts a critical eye on the judgment of the German Constitutional Court. It identifies significant shortcomings from both a German constitutional and a European Union perspective.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:contributor>Griller, Stefan</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Klamert, Marcus</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Malferrari, Luigi</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Griller, Stefan</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Basedow, Jürgen</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Tomkin, Jonathan</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Dietze, Jan</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Thym, Daniel</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Klamert, Marcus</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Kellerbauer, Manuel</dc:creator>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/44"/>
    <dc:contributor>Schnichels, Dominik</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Basedow, Jürgen</dc:creator>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Ja
Diese Publikation teilen