Publikation: Education reform and education gaps
Lade...
Dateien
Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.
Datum
2017
Autor:innen
Jahanshahi, Babak
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
Applied Economics Letters. 2017, 24(19), pp. 1385-1388. ISSN 1350-4851. eISSN 1466-4291. Available under: doi: 10.1080/13504851.2017.1282110
Zusammenfassung
We estimate the causal effect of the Italian 2009 “Gelmini” education reform on four academic performance gaps relating to immigration status, gender, parental social status, and parental education. The reform led to a reduction in the number of teachers and an increase in class size. Lags in implementing the reform for different grades is used to specify a difference-in-difference identification strategy. We find that the reform had a statistically and economically significant effect on the immigrant-native gap and on the gender gap, but not on the gap between students with more and less favourable family background. Particularly, our findings show that students with an immigration background were the main losers from the Gelmini reform.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
330 Wirtschaft
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690
JAHANSHAHI, Babak, Arash NAGHAVI, 2017. Education reform and education gaps. In: Applied Economics Letters. 2017, 24(19), pp. 1385-1388. ISSN 1350-4851. eISSN 1466-4291. Available under: doi: 10.1080/13504851.2017.1282110BibTex
@article{Jahanshahi2017-11-11Educa-40611,
year={2017},
doi={10.1080/13504851.2017.1282110},
title={Education reform and education gaps},
number={19},
volume={24},
issn={1350-4851},
journal={Applied Economics Letters},
pages={1385--1388},
author={Jahanshahi, Babak and Naghavi, Arash}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40611">
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-11-14T10:03:21Z</dc:date>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-11-14T10:03:21Z</dcterms:available>
<dcterms:issued>2017-11-11</dcterms:issued>
<dc:creator>Jahanshahi, Babak</dc:creator>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/46"/>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/46"/>
<dcterms:title>Education reform and education gaps</dcterms:title>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:creator>Naghavi, Arash</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>Jahanshahi, Babak</dc:contributor>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/40611"/>
<dc:contributor>Naghavi, Arash</dc:contributor>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">We estimate the causal effect of the Italian 2009 “Gelmini” education reform on four academic performance gaps relating to immigration status, gender, parental social status, and parental education. The reform led to a reduction in the number of teachers and an increase in class size. Lags in implementing the reform for different grades is used to specify a difference-in-difference identification strategy. We find that the reform had a statistically and economically significant effect on the immigrant-native gap and on the gender gap, but not on the gap between students with more and less favourable family background. Particularly, our findings show that students with an immigration background were the main losers from the Gelmini reform.</dcterms:abstract>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
