Publikation:

The Impact of Mild Cognitive Impairment on Gait and Balance : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Using Instrumented Assessment

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

Datum

2017

Autor:innen

Bahureksa, Lindsay
Najafi, Bijan
Saleh, Ahlam
Sabbagh, Marwan
Coon, David
Mohler, M. Jane

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Gerontology. Karger. 2017, 63(1), pp. 67-83. ISSN 0304-324X. eISSN 1423-0003. Available under: doi: 10.1159/000445831

Zusammenfassung

Background: In addition to cognitive deficits, people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) can experience motor dysfunction, including deficits in gait and balance. Objective, instrumented motor performance assessment may allow the detection of subtle MCI-related motor deficits, allowing early diagnosis and intervention. Motor assessment under dual-task conditions may increase diagnostic accuracy; however, the sensitivity of different cognitive tasks is unclear.

Objective: To systematically review the extant literature focusing on instrumented assessment of gait and balance parameters for discriminating MCI patients from cognitively intact peers.

Methods: Database searches were conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO and Web of Science. Inclusion criteria were: (1) clinically confirmed MCI; (2) instrumented measurement of gait and/or balance; (3) English language, and (4) reporting gait or balance parameters which could be included in a meta-analysis for discriminating between MCI patients and cognitively intact individuals based on weighted effect size (d).

Results: Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria and reported quantitative gait (n = 11) or postural balance (n = 4) parameters to be included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis revealed that several gait parameters including velocity (d = -0.74, p < 0.01), stride length (d = -0.65, p < 0.01), and stride time (mean: d = 0.56, p = 0.02; coefficient of variation: d = 0.50, p < 0.01) discriminated best between MCI and healthy controls under single-task conditions. Importantly, dual-task assessment increased the discriminative power of gait variables wherein gait variables with counting tasks appeared to be more sensitive (range d = 0.84-1.35) compared to verbal fluency tasks such as animal naming (range d = 0.65-0.94). Balance parameters identified as significant discriminators were anterior-posterior (d = 0.49, p < 0.01) and mediolateral (d = -0.34, p = 0.04) sway position in the eyes-open condition but not eyes-closed condition.

Conclusion: Existing studies provide evidence that MCI affects specific gait parameters. MCI-related gait changes were most pronounced when subjects are challenged cognitively (i.e., dual task), suggesting that gait assessment with an additional cognitive task is useful for diagnosis and outcome analysis in the target population. Static balance seems to also be affected by MCI, although limited evidence exists. Instrumented motor assessment could provide a critical opportunity for MCI diagnosis and tailored intervention targeting specific deficits and potentially slowing progression to dementia. Further studies are required to confirm our findings.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
796 Sport

Schlagwörter

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690BAHUREKSA, Lindsay, Bijan NAJAFI, Ahlam SALEH, Marwan SABBAGH, David COON, M. Jane MOHLER, Michael SCHWENK, 2017. The Impact of Mild Cognitive Impairment on Gait and Balance : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Using Instrumented Assessment. In: Gerontology. Karger. 2017, 63(1), pp. 67-83. ISSN 0304-324X. eISSN 1423-0003. Available under: doi: 10.1159/000445831
BibTex
@article{Bahureksa2017Impac-55186,
  year={2017},
  doi={10.1159/000445831},
  title={The Impact of Mild Cognitive Impairment on Gait and Balance : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Using Instrumented Assessment},
  number={1},
  volume={63},
  issn={0304-324X},
  journal={Gerontology},
  pages={67--83},
  author={Bahureksa, Lindsay and Najafi, Bijan and Saleh, Ahlam and Sabbagh, Marwan and Coon, David and Mohler, M. Jane and Schwenk, Michael}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/55186">
    <dc:contributor>Schwenk, Michael</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:issued>2017</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Background: In addition to cognitive deficits, people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) can experience motor dysfunction, including deficits in gait and balance. Objective, instrumented motor performance assessment may allow the detection of subtle MCI-related motor deficits, allowing early diagnosis and intervention. Motor assessment under dual-task conditions may increase diagnostic accuracy; however, the sensitivity of different cognitive tasks is unclear.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Objective: To systematically review the extant literature focusing on instrumented assessment of gait and balance parameters for discriminating MCI patients from cognitively intact peers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Methods: Database searches were conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO and Web of Science. Inclusion criteria were: (1) clinically confirmed MCI; (2) instrumented measurement of gait and/or balance; (3) English language, and (4) reporting gait or balance parameters which could be included in a meta-analysis for discriminating between MCI patients and cognitively intact individuals based on weighted effect size (d).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Results: Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria and reported quantitative gait (n = 11) or postural balance (n = 4) parameters to be included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis revealed that several gait parameters including velocity (d = -0.74, p &lt; 0.01), stride length (d = -0.65, p &lt; 0.01), and stride time (mean: d = 0.56, p = 0.02; coefficient of variation: d = 0.50, p &lt; 0.01) discriminated best between MCI and healthy controls under single-task conditions. Importantly, dual-task assessment increased the discriminative power of gait variables wherein gait variables with counting tasks appeared to be more sensitive (range d = 0.84-1.35) compared to verbal fluency tasks such as animal naming (range d = 0.65-0.94). Balance parameters identified as significant discriminators were anterior-posterior (d = 0.49, p &lt; 0.01) and mediolateral (d = -0.34, p = 0.04) sway position in the eyes-open condition but not eyes-closed condition.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Conclusion: Existing studies provide evidence that MCI affects specific gait parameters. MCI-related gait changes were most pronounced when subjects are challenged cognitively (i.e., dual task), suggesting that gait assessment with an additional cognitive task is useful for diagnosis and outcome analysis in the target population. Static balance seems to also be affected by MCI, although limited evidence exists. Instrumented motor assessment could provide a critical opportunity for MCI diagnosis and tailored intervention targeting specific deficits and potentially slowing progression to dementia. Further studies are required to confirm our findings.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dc:creator>Najafi, Bijan</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:title>The Impact of Mild Cognitive Impairment on Gait and Balance : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Using Instrumented Assessment</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-10-08T07:54:18Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:contributor>Najafi, Bijan</dc:contributor>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:creator>Schwenk, Michael</dc:creator>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/35"/>
    <dc:creator>Sabbagh, Marwan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-10-08T07:54:18Z</dc:date>
    <dc:contributor>Sabbagh, Marwan</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Bahureksa, Lindsay</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Coon, David</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Coon, David</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Mohler, M. Jane</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Saleh, Ahlam</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Bahureksa, Lindsay</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Mohler, M. Jane</dc:creator>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/35"/>
    <dc:contributor>Saleh, Ahlam</dc:contributor>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/55186"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Nein
Begutachtet
Ja
Diese Publikation teilen