Publikation:

What Linguistics Universals can be true of

Vorschaubild

Dateien

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

Datum

2009

Autor:innen

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

URI (zitierfähiger Link)
http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-opus-110120
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung

Sammlungen

Linguistik: Publikationen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Beitrag zu einem Sammelband
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

SCALISE, Sergio, ed. and others. Universals of Language Today. Dordrecht: Springer, 2009, pp. 31-58

Zusammenfassung

Universals in linguistics were traditionally intended to be true of languages: for all languages, p or for all languages, if p then q . Our contention, by contrast, is that many universals have a narrower scope than languages as such, or mental lexicons-and-grammars as such. Linguistic universals are not axiomatically to be conceived of as universals of language: it is only derivatively namely if universals are true of all parts of each language and of all representations of forms-in-constructions of each language that this is what they may amount to. Only very basic organising principles of lexicons and grammars should really be expected to make their influence felt pervasively, over all parts and all representations.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
400 Sprachwissenschaft, Linguistik

Schlagwörter

order, asymmetry, coronal, gender, infixation, markedness, universals

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690LAHIRI, Aditi, Frans PLANK, 2009. What Linguistics Universals can be true of. In: SCALISE, Sergio, ed. and others. Universals of Language Today. Dordrecht: Springer, 2009, pp. 31-58
BibTex
@incollection{Lahiri2009Lingu-2686,
  year={2009},
  title={What Linguistics Universals can be true of},
  publisher={Springer},
  address={Dordrecht},
  booktitle={Universals of Language Today},
  pages={31--58},
  editor={Scalise, Sergio},
  author={Lahiri, Aditi and Plank, Frans}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/2686">
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/2686"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Universals in linguistics were traditionally intended to be true of languages:  for all languages, p  or  for all languages, if p  then q . Our contention, by contrast, is that many universals have a narrower scope than languages as such, or mental lexicons-and-grammars as such. Linguistic universals are not axiomatically to be conceived of as universals of language: it is only derivatively namely if universals are true of all parts of each language and of all representations of forms-in-constructions of each language that this is what they may amount to. Only very basic organising principles of lexicons and grammars should really be expected to make their influence felt pervasively, over all parts and all representations.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>Publ. in: Universals of Language Today / Sergio Scalise ... (eds.). Dordrecht: Springer, 2009, pp. 31-58</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:title>What Linguistics Universals can be true of</dcterms:title>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:contributor>Lahiri, Aditi</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dc:creator>Plank, Frans</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Plank, Frans</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/>
    <dc:creator>Lahiri, Aditi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-23T09:58:47Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-23T09:58:47Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:issued>2009</dcterms:issued>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen