Publikation: Bayes Factors show evidence against systematic relationships between the anchoring effect and the Big Five personality traits
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
Examining personality traits as predictors of human behaviour is of high interest. There are several but inconclusive reported relationships of personality and the susceptibility to the “anchoring effect”, a tendency to adjust estimates towards a given anchor. To provide an answer to variably reported links between personality traits and the anchoring effect, we collected data from 1000 participants in the lab and validated typical anchoring effects and representative personality scores of the sample. Using Bayesian statistical data analyses, we found evidence for the absence of a relationship between anchoring effects and personality scores. We, therefore, conclude that there are no specific personality traits that relate to a higher susceptibility to the anchoring effect. The lack of a relationship between personality and the susceptibility to the anchoring effect might be due to the specific anchoring design, be limited to specific cognitive domains, or the susceptibility to anchors might reflect no reliable individual cognitive phenomena. In the next step, studies should examine the reliability of anchoring effects on the individual level, and testing relationships of individual traits and anchoring effects for other types of anchors, anchoring designs, or cognitive domains.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
SCHINDLER, Sebastian, Jan QUERENGÄSSER, Maximilian BRUCHMANN, Nele Johanna BÖGEMANN, Robert MOECK, Thomas STRAUBE, 2021. Bayes Factors show evidence against systematic relationships between the anchoring effect and the Big Five personality traits. In: Scientific Reports. Springer Nature. 2021, 11(1), 7021. eISSN 2045-2322. Available under: doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86429-2BibTex
@article{Schindler2021Bayes-53616, year={2021}, doi={10.1038/s41598-021-86429-2}, title={Bayes Factors show evidence against systematic relationships between the anchoring effect and the Big Five personality traits}, number={1}, volume={11}, journal={Scientific Reports}, author={Schindler, Sebastian and Querengässer, Jan and Bruchmann, Maximilian and Bögemann, Nele Johanna and Moeck, Robert and Straube, Thomas}, note={Article Number: 7021} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/53616"> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dc:contributor>Querengässer, Jan</dc:contributor> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:contributor>Straube, Thomas</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Bruchmann, Maximilian</dc:contributor> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/53616"/> <dcterms:issued>2021</dcterms:issued> <dc:contributor>Moeck, Robert</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Moeck, Robert</dc:creator> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-05-06T14:20:02Z</dcterms:available> <dc:contributor>Bögemann, Nele Johanna</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Straube, Thomas</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Bruchmann, Maximilian</dc:creator> <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dcterms:title>Bayes Factors show evidence against systematic relationships between the anchoring effect and the Big Five personality traits</dcterms:title> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/53616/1/Schindler_2-1t7gk9x6kespb4.pdf"/> <dc:contributor>Schindler, Sebastian</dc:contributor> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/53616/1/Schindler_2-1t7gk9x6kespb4.pdf"/> <dc:creator>Querengässer, Jan</dc:creator> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-05-06T14:20:02Z</dc:date> <dc:creator>Bögemann, Nele Johanna</dc:creator> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:creator>Schindler, Sebastian</dc:creator> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Examining personality traits as predictors of human behaviour is of high interest. There are several but inconclusive reported relationships of personality and the susceptibility to the “anchoring effect”, a tendency to adjust estimates towards a given anchor. To provide an answer to variably reported links between personality traits and the anchoring effect, we collected data from 1000 participants in the lab and validated typical anchoring effects and representative personality scores of the sample. Using Bayesian statistical data analyses, we found evidence for the absence of a relationship between anchoring effects and personality scores. We, therefore, conclude that there are no specific personality traits that relate to a higher susceptibility to the anchoring effect. The lack of a relationship between personality and the susceptibility to the anchoring effect might be due to the specific anchoring design, be limited to specific cognitive domains, or the susceptibility to anchors might reflect no reliable individual cognitive phenomena. In the next step, studies should examine the reliability of anchoring effects on the individual level, and testing relationships of individual traits and anchoring effects for other types of anchors, anchoring designs, or cognitive domains.</dcterms:abstract> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>