Publikation:

Keynote address: Why everyone seems to be using spring embedders for network visualization, and should not

Vorschaubild

Dateien

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

Datum

2011

Autor:innen

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
https://doi.org/10.1109/PACIFICVIS.2011.5742366
ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung

Sammlungen

Informatik und Informationswissenschaft: Publikationen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Beitrag zu einem Konferenzband
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

2011 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis 2011) : Hong Kong, China, 1 - 4 March 2011. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 2011, pp. xii. ISBN 978-1-61284-935-5. Available under: doi: 10.1109/PACIFICVIS.2011.5742366

Zusammenfassung

The main algorithmic challenge in network visualization is the placement of nodes. While plenty of layout algorithms have been proposed, the vast majority of information visualization tools appears to utilize (sometimes a variant of) one of two algorithms: the approach of Fruchterman and Reingold or that of Kamada and Kawai. Both are often referred to as force-directed methods, or spring embedders, and praised for their general applicability, high adaptability, and simplicity. I will argue that commonly used implementations and even the approaches themselves are outdated and, in fact, have always been. They should be replaced by variants of multidimensional scaling that display superior results and scalability, and are just as flexible and easy to implement. Some of these statements may actually be backed by evidence.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
004 Informatik

Schlagwörter

Konferenz

2011 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis), 1. März 2011 - 4. März 2011, Hong Kong, China
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690BRANDES, Ulrik, 2011. Keynote address: Why everyone seems to be using spring embedders for network visualization, and should not. 2011 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis). Hong Kong, China, 1. März 2011 - 4. März 2011. In: 2011 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis 2011) : Hong Kong, China, 1 - 4 March 2011. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 2011, pp. xii. ISBN 978-1-61284-935-5. Available under: doi: 10.1109/PACIFICVIS.2011.5742366
BibTex
@inproceedings{Brandes2011-03Keyno-36931,
  year={2011},
  doi={10.1109/PACIFICVIS.2011.5742366},
  title={Keynote address: Why everyone seems to be using spring embedders for network visualization, and should not},
  isbn={978-1-61284-935-5},
  publisher={IEEE},
  address={Piscataway, NJ},
  booktitle={2011 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis 2011) : Hong Kong, China, 1 - 4 March 2011},
  author={Brandes, Ulrik}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/36931">
    <dc:creator>Brandes, Ulrik</dc:creator>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The main algorithmic challenge in network visualization is the placement of nodes. While plenty of layout algorithms have been proposed, the vast majority of information visualization tools appears to utilize (sometimes a variant of) one of two algorithms: the approach of Fruchterman and Reingold or that of Kamada and Kawai. Both are often referred to as force-directed methods, or spring embedders, and praised for their general applicability, high adaptability, and simplicity. I will argue that commonly used implementations and even the approaches themselves are outdated and, in fact, have always been. They should be replaced by variants of multidimensional scaling that display superior results and scalability, and are just as flexible and easy to implement. Some of these statements may actually be backed by evidence.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:issued>2011-03</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/36"/>
    <dcterms:title>Keynote address: Why everyone seems to be using spring embedders for network visualization, and should not</dcterms:title>
    <dc:contributor>Brandes, Ulrik</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-01-24T14:06:16Z</dcterms:available>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-01-24T14:06:16Z</dc:date>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/36"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/36931"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen