Publikation: Modal Structuralism and Reflection
Lade...
Dateien
Datum
2019
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
The Review of Symbolic Logic. Cambridge University Press. 2019, 12(4), pp. 823-860. ISSN 1755-0203. eISSN 1755-0211. Available under: doi: 10.1017/S1755020318000138
Zusammenfassung
Modal structuralism promises an interpretation of set theory that avoids commitment to abstracta. This article investigates its underlying assumptions. In the first part, I start by highlighting some shortcomings of the standard axiomatisation of modal structuralism, and propose a new axiomatisation I call MSST (for Modal Structural Set Theory). The main theorem is that MSST interprets exactly Zermelo set theory plus the claim that every set is in some inaccessible rank of the cumulative hierarchy. In the second part of the article, I look at the prospects for supplementing MSST with a modal structural reflection principle, as suggested in Hellman (2015). I show that Hellman’s principle is inconsistent (Theorem 5.32), and argue that modal structural reflection principles in general are either incompatible with modal structuralism or extremely weak
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
100 Philosophie
Schlagwörter
structuralism, modal structuralism, set theory, modal logic, plural logic, large cardinals, reflection principles
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690
ROBERTS, Sam, 2019. Modal Structuralism and Reflection. In: The Review of Symbolic Logic. Cambridge University Press. 2019, 12(4), pp. 823-860. ISSN 1755-0203. eISSN 1755-0211. Available under: doi: 10.1017/S1755020318000138BibTex
@article{Roberts2019Modal-53566,
year={2019},
doi={10.1017/S1755020318000138},
title={Modal Structuralism and Reflection},
number={4},
volume={12},
issn={1755-0203},
journal={The Review of Symbolic Logic},
pages={823--860},
author={Roberts, Sam}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/53566">
<dcterms:issued>2019</dcterms:issued>
<dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/53566/1/Roberts_2-1sve2a0zfnqcl1.pdf"/>
<dc:contributor>Roberts, Sam</dc:contributor>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
<dc:creator>Roberts, Sam</dc:creator>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-04-30T12:56:00Z</dcterms:available>
<dcterms:title>Modal Structuralism and Reflection</dcterms:title>
<dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/53566/1/Roberts_2-1sve2a0zfnqcl1.pdf"/>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/53566"/>
<dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Modal structuralism promises an interpretation of set theory that avoids commitment to abstracta. This article investigates its underlying assumptions. In the first part, I start by highlighting some shortcomings of the standard axiomatisation of modal structuralism, and propose a new axiomatisation I call MSST (for Modal Structural Set Theory). The main theorem is that MSST interprets exactly Zermelo set theory plus the claim that every set is in some inaccessible rank of the cumulative hierarchy. In the second part of the article, I look at the prospects for supplementing MSST with a modal structural reflection principle, as suggested in Hellman (2015). I show that Hellman’s principle is inconsistent (Theorem 5.32), and argue that modal structural reflection principles in general are either incompatible with modal structuralism or extremely weak</dcterms:abstract>
<dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-04-30T12:56:00Z</dc:date>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Nein
Begutachtet
Unbekannt
