Publikation: Validation and quality control of replacement alternatives : current status and future challenges
Dateien
Datum
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
Alternatives to animal testing have been developed mainly in the fields of toxicology and vaccine testing. Typical examples are the evaluation of phototoxicity, eye irritation or skin corrosion/irritation of cosmetics and industrial chemicals. However, examples can also be found in other biomedical areas, such the control of the quality of drug preparations for pyrogens or for the control of the production process of biologics, such as botulinum neurotoxin. For regulatory purposes, the quality, transferability and predictivity of an alternative method needs to be evaluated. This procedure is called the “validation process” of a new method. It follows defined rules, and several governmental institutions have been established to perform, supervise or advise on this process. As this often results in a delay of method implementation, different alternatives for the evaluation of a method's suitability and quality are under discussion. We describe here the principles of model development and quality control. We also give an overview on methods that have undergone validation. Strengths and shortcomings of traditional approaches are discussed, and new developments and challenges are outlined.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
LEIST, Marcel, Nina HASIWA, Mardas DANESHIAN, Thomas HARTUNG, 2012. Validation and quality control of replacement alternatives : current status and future challenges. In: Toxicology Research. 2012, 1(1), pp. 8-22. ISSN 2045-452X. Available under: doi: 10.1039/C2TX20011BBibTex
@article{Leist2012Valid-19871,
year={2012},
doi={10.1039/C2TX20011B},
title={Validation and quality control of replacement alternatives : current status and future challenges},
number={1},
volume={1},
issn={2045-452X},
journal={Toxicology Research},
pages={8--22},
author={Leist, Marcel and Hasiwa, Nina and Daneshian, Mardas and Hartung, Thomas}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/19871">
<dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dcterms:issued>2012</dcterms:issued>
<dcterms:title>Validation and quality control of replacement alternatives : current status and future challenges</dcterms:title>
<dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/19871/1/Leist_edit_1_GSPR.pdf"/>
<dc:creator>Hasiwa, Nina</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Hartung, Thomas</dc:creator>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2013-05-14T22:25:05Z</dcterms:available>
<dc:contributor>Daneshian, Mardas</dc:contributor>
<dc:contributor>Hartung, Thomas</dc:contributor>
<dc:creator>Daneshian, Mardas</dc:creator>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/19871"/>
<dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
<dc:contributor>Leist, Marcel</dc:contributor>
<dc:creator>Leist, Marcel</dc:creator>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2012-07-26T08:06:29Z</dc:date>
<dcterms:bibliographicCitation>Publ. in: Toxicology Research ; 1 (2012), 1. - pp. 8-22</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/19871/1/Leist_edit_1_GSPR.pdf"/>
<dc:contributor>Hasiwa, Nina</dc:contributor>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
<dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Alternatives to animal testing have been developed mainly in the fields of toxicology and vaccine testing. Typical examples are the evaluation of phototoxicity, eye irritation or skin corrosion/irritation of cosmetics and industrial chemicals. However, examples can also be found in other biomedical areas, such the control of the quality of drug preparations for pyrogens or for the control of the production process of biologics, such as botulinum neurotoxin. For regulatory purposes, the quality, transferability and predictivity of an alternative method needs to be evaluated. This procedure is called the “validation process” of a new method. It follows defined rules, and several governmental institutions have been established to perform, supervise or advise on this process. As this often results in a delay of method implementation, different alternatives for the evaluation of a method's suitability and quality are under discussion. We describe here the principles of model development and quality control. We also give an overview on methods that have undergone validation. Strengths and shortcomings of traditional approaches are discussed, and new developments and challenges are outlined.</dcterms:abstract>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
