Publikation: Has Globalisation Affected Collective Bargaining? : An Empirical Test, 1980-2009
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
We investigate whether globalisation has affected the nature of collective bargaining in OECD and emerging countries. The main innovations over the existing empirical literature are (i) the consideration of three distinct aspects of collective bargaining (union density, decentralised bargaining and the extent of government intervention), (ii) the reliance on a sample with a larger cross-sectional and time dimension (44 countries from 1980 to 2009), and (iii) the application of a more appropriate empirical methodology (dynamic panel data models). We find that globalisation, on average, depresses unionisation but neither affects the degree of decentralisation nor government intervention in collective bargaining. We also uncover significant effect heterogeneity, both across countries and over time.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
HESSAMI, Zohal, Thushyanthan BASKARAN, 2015. Has Globalisation Affected Collective Bargaining? : An Empirical Test, 1980-2009. In: The World Economy. 2015, 38(12), pp. 1880-1911. ISSN 0378-5920. eISSN 1467-9701. Available under: doi: 10.1111/twec.12239BibTex
@article{Hessami2015Globa-31384,
year={2015},
doi={10.1111/twec.12239},
title={Has Globalisation Affected Collective Bargaining? : An Empirical Test, 1980-2009},
number={12},
volume={38},
issn={0378-5920},
journal={The World Economy},
pages={1880--1911},
author={Hessami, Zohal and Baskaran, Thushyanthan}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/31384">
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/46"/>
<dcterms:title>Has Globalisation Affected Collective Bargaining? : An Empirical Test, 1980-2009</dcterms:title>
<dc:contributor>Hessami, Zohal</dc:contributor>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/46"/>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-07-08T06:19:11Z</dc:date>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:creator>Baskaran, Thushyanthan</dc:creator>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/31384"/>
<dc:creator>Hessami, Zohal</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>Baskaran, Thushyanthan</dc:contributor>
<dcterms:issued>2015</dcterms:issued>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-07-08T06:19:11Z</dcterms:available>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">We investigate whether globalisation has affected the nature of collective bargaining in OECD and emerging countries. The main innovations over the existing empirical literature are (i) the consideration of three distinct aspects of collective bargaining (union density, decentralised bargaining and the extent of government intervention), (ii) the reliance on a sample with a larger cross-sectional and time dimension (44 countries from 1980 to 2009), and (iii) the application of a more appropriate empirical methodology (dynamic panel data models). We find that globalisation, on average, depresses unionisation but neither affects the degree of decentralisation nor government intervention in collective bargaining. We also uncover significant effect heterogeneity, both across countries and over time.</dcterms:abstract>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>