Methodological issues in recovery research
Methodological issues in recovery research
No Thumbnail Available
Files
There are no files associated with this item.
Date
2009
Authors
Geurts, Sabine A. E.
Editors
Journal ISSN
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliographical data
Publisher
Series
DOI (citable link)
International patent number
Link to the license
oops
EU project number
Project
Open Access publication
Collections
Title in another language
Publication type
Contribution to a collection
Publication status
Published
Published in
Current perspectives on job-stress recovery / Sonnentag, Sabine; Perrewé, Pamela L.; Ganster, Daniel C. (ed.). - Bingley : Emerald, 2009. - (Research in occupational stress and well being ; 7). - pp. 1-36. - ISBN 978-1-84855-544-0
Abstract
This chapter describes methodological issues that are relevant for research on recovery. We aim to provide an overview of methodological approaches that have been or can be used in recovery research, and to provide methodological guidelines that researchers may use in assessing the process of recovery. We argue that studies on recovery must be explicit about recovery settings, recovery processes (i.e., activities and experiences) and recovery outcomes. We describe typical operationalizations of these three perspectives and focus in more detail on potential measures of recovery outcomes. We give an overview of research designs including experiments and quasi-experiments, diary studies, and longitudinal field studies. We conclude by pointing to remaining challenges for researchers in the area of recovery.
Summary in another language
Subject (DDC)
150 Psychology
Keywords
Conference
Review
undefined / . - undefined, undefined. - (undefined; undefined)
Cite This
ISO 690
SONNENTAG, Sabine, Sabine A. E. GEURTS, 2009. Methodological issues in recovery research. In: SONNENTAG, Sabine, ed., Pamela L. PERREWÉ, ed., Daniel C. GANSTER, ed.. Current perspectives on job-stress recovery. Bingley:Emerald, pp. 1-36. ISBN 978-1-84855-544-0. Available under: doi: 10.1108/S1479-3555(2009)0000007004BibTex
@incollection{Sonnentag2009Metho-60019, year={2009}, doi={10.1108/S1479-3555(2009)0000007004}, title={Methodological issues in recovery research}, number={7}, isbn={978-1-84855-544-0}, publisher={Emerald}, address={Bingley}, series={Research in occupational stress and well being}, booktitle={Current perspectives on job-stress recovery}, pages={1--36}, editor={Sonnentag, Sabine and Perrewé, Pamela L. and Ganster, Daniel C.}, author={Sonnentag, Sabine and Geurts, Sabine A. E.} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/60019"> <dc:contributor>Sonnentag, Sabine</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Geurts, Sabine A. E.</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Geurts, Sabine A. E.</dc:creator> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:title>Methodological issues in recovery research</dcterms:title> <dc:creator>Sonnentag, Sabine</dc:creator> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:issued>2009</dcterms:issued> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/60019"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This chapter describes methodological issues that are relevant for research on recovery. We aim to provide an overview of methodological approaches that have been or can be used in recovery research, and to provide methodological guidelines that researchers may use in assessing the process of recovery. We argue that studies on recovery must be explicit about recovery settings, recovery processes (i.e., activities and experiences) and recovery outcomes. We describe typical operationalizations of these three perspectives and focus in more detail on potential measures of recovery outcomes. We give an overview of research designs including experiments and quasi-experiments, diary studies, and longitudinal field studies. We conclude by pointing to remaining challenges for researchers in the area of recovery.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-01-31T14:34:28Z</dc:date> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-01-31T14:34:28Z</dcterms:available> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>
Internal note
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Examination date of dissertation
Method of financing
Comment on publication
Alliance license
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
International Co-Authors
Bibliography of Konstanz
Yes