Publikation: Tit for Others' Tat : Repeated Prisoner's Dilemma Experiments with Third-Party Monitoring and Indirect Punishment
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
Two pairs of two participants each interact repeatedly in two structurally Independent but informationally linked Prisoner’s Dilemma games. Neither pair receives Feedback about past choices by their own partner but is fully informed about the choices by the other pair. Considering this as a four-person infinite horizon game allows for Folk-Theorem-like voluntary cooperation. We ask whether monitoring and indirect punishment with the help of others are comparable to direct monitoring and punishment in establishing and maintaining voluntary cooperation. The treatment effects we find are rather weak. Others’ monitoring of own activities is only an insufficient substitute for direct observability.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
BRUTTEL, Lisa, Werner GÜTH, 2013. Tit for Others' Tat : Repeated Prisoner's Dilemma Experiments with Third-Party Monitoring and Indirect PunishmentBibTex
@techreport{Bruttel2013Other-25329, year={2013}, series={Research paper series / Thurgauer Wirtschaftsinstitut}, title={Tit for Others' Tat : Repeated Prisoner's Dilemma Experiments with Third-Party Monitoring and Indirect Punishment}, number={85}, author={Bruttel, Lisa and Güth, Werner} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/25329"> <dc:creator>Bruttel, Lisa</dc:creator> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/25329/1/Bruttel_253293.pdf"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dcterms:title>Tit for Others' Tat : Repeated Prisoner's Dilemma Experiments with Third-Party Monitoring and Indirect Punishment</dcterms:title> <dc:contributor>Güth, Werner</dc:contributor> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/46"/> <dc:creator>Güth, Werner</dc:creator> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/25329/1/Bruttel_253293.pdf"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/46"/> <dc:contributor>Bruttel, Lisa</dc:contributor> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2013-12-04T08:37:41Z</dcterms:available> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2013-12-04T08:37:41Z</dc:date> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/25329"/> <dcterms:issued>2013</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Two pairs of two participants each interact repeatedly in two structurally Independent but informationally linked Prisoner’s Dilemma games. Neither pair receives Feedback about past choices by their own partner but is fully informed about the choices by the other pair. Considering this as a four-person infinite horizon game allows for Folk-Theorem-like voluntary cooperation. We ask whether monitoring and indirect punishment with the help of others are comparable to direct monitoring and punishment in establishing and maintaining voluntary cooperation. The treatment effects we find are rather weak. Others’ monitoring of own activities is only an insufficient substitute for direct observability.</dcterms:abstract> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>