Modern Times : A construction manual
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
This ‘construction manual’ tries to deal with the paradoxes inherent in so many attempts to define modernity: the try to construct themselves a foundation as a starting point of their own development, just to identify this base as void in retrospect. The solution to this paradox suggested here, however, does not call for the abandonment of modernity as a term or concept altogether, but for a revised conception of modernity: an understanding that does not define modernity as a starting or end point of development, but (only) as the respective present. In other words: we need a new form of history. The alternative advocated here is to understand historical time as a network of ‘chronoferences’, i.e. a history that is not about chronologically consistent development, but about temporal relations between present and absent times that are kept present by actors and practices. This could constitute a non-chronocentric form of history.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
LANDWEHR, Achim, 2024. Modern Times : A construction manual. In: History of European Ideas. Taylor & Francis. ISSN 0191-6599. eISSN 1873-541X. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1080/01916599.2024.2373546BibTex
@article{Landwehr2024-07-09Moder-70687, year={2024}, doi={10.1080/01916599.2024.2373546}, title={Modern Times : A construction manual}, issn={0191-6599}, journal={History of European Ideas}, author={Landwehr, Achim} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/70687"> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:creator>Landwehr, Achim</dc:creator> <dcterms:title>Modern Times : A construction manual</dcterms:title> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/70687"/> <dc:contributor>Landwehr, Achim</dc:contributor> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/32"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2024-08-30T10:06:49Z</dcterms:available> <dcterms:issued>2024-07-09</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/32"/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2024-08-30T10:06:49Z</dc:date> <dcterms:abstract>This ‘construction manual’ tries to deal with the paradoxes inherent in so many attempts to define modernity: the try to construct themselves a foundation as a starting point of their own development, just to identify this base as void in retrospect. The solution to this paradox suggested here, however, does not call for the abandonment of modernity as a term or concept altogether, but for a revised conception of modernity: an understanding that does not define modernity as a starting or end point of development, but (only) as the respective present. In other words: we need a new form of history. The alternative advocated here is to understand historical time as a network of ‘chronoferences’, i.e. a history that is not about chronologically consistent development, but about temporal relations between present and absent times that are kept present by actors and practices. This could constitute a non-chronocentric form of history.</dcterms:abstract> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>