Publikation:

On "Golden Parachutes" as Manager Discipline Devices in Takeover Contests

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

TWI_res17.pdf
TWI_res17.pdfGröße: 1.26 MBDownloads: 199

Datum

2007

Autor:innen

Fabel, Oliver
Kolmar, Martin

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Auflagebezeichnung

DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Working Paper/Technical Report
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Zusammenfassung

The effect of severance pay on management behavior during a takeover battle is generally ambiguous. Yet, the severance payment completely restraining all influence activities always constitutes a golden parachute. The manager leaving office still benefits from the increase in the merged firm s total value. Moreover, given that managers are compensated according to an identical scheme, the optimal shareholder policy always entails a corner solution. Managers will either receive no severance pay, or the payment will be chosen such that their influence activities equal zero. Relatively strong incentive intensities and low synergy gains then imply that offering no severance pay dominates.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
330 Wirtschaft

Schlagwörter

mergers, contests, golden parachute

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690FABEL, Oliver, Martin KOLMAR, 2007. On "Golden Parachutes" as Manager Discipline Devices in Takeover Contests
BibTex
@techreport{Fabel2007Golde-12242,
  year={2007},
  series={Research paper series / Thurgauer Wirtschaftsinstitut},
  title={On "Golden Parachutes" as Manager Discipline Devices in Takeover Contests},
  number={17},
  author={Fabel, Oliver and Kolmar, Martin}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/12242">
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/12242/1/TWI_res17.pdf"/>
    <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/46"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The effect of severance pay on management behavior during a takeover battle is generally ambiguous. Yet, the severance payment completely restraining all influence activities always constitutes a golden parachute. The manager leaving office still benefits from the increase in the merged firm s total value. Moreover, given that managers are compensated according to an identical scheme, the optimal shareholder policy always entails a corner solution. Managers will either receive no severance pay, or the payment will be chosen such that their influence activities equal zero. Relatively strong incentive intensities and low synergy gains then imply that offering no severance pay dominates.</dcterms:abstract>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic</dc:rights>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-25T09:43:44Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-25T09:43:44Z</dcterms:available>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/12242"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2007</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:creator>Fabel, Oliver</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Kolmar, Martin</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/12242/1/TWI_res17.pdf"/>
    <dc:creator>Kolmar, Martin</dc:creator>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:contributor>Fabel, Oliver</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:title>On "Golden Parachutes" as Manager Discipline Devices in Takeover Contests</dcterms:title>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/46"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen