Publikation:

What to do when feeling bored? : Students' strategies for coping with boredom

Vorschaubild

Dateien

nettgoetzdaniels.pdf
nettgoetzdaniels.pdfGröße: 8.77 MBDownloads: 4630

Datum

2010

Autor:innen

Daniels, Lia Marie

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

URI (zitierfähiger Link)
http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-opus-129503
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.09.004
ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Link zur Lizenz
Urheberrechtlich geschützt

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green

Sammlungen

Empirische Bildungsforschung: Publikationen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Learning and Individual Differences. 2010, 20(6), pp. 626-638. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2010.09.004

Zusammenfassung

The goal of this study was to explore different strategies for coping with boredom. A questionnaire was developed targeting two dimensions of coping, namely approach versus avoidance oriented coping and cognitive versus behavioral oriented coping. First, based on the responses of 976 students (51% female) from grades 5 to 10, the structure of the coping with boredom scales was verified by confirmatory factor analysis. In a second step, 3 different boredom-coping groups were identified by latent profile analysis. These three groups were named Reappraisers, Criticizers, and Evaders. Third, differences between these groups concerning their frequency of experiencing boredom, their academic achievement, and other emotional, motivational, and cognitive aspects of academic achievement situations were analyzed. Relative to the other 2 groups, Reappraisers preferred cognitive-approach strategies, were less frequently bored, and experienced the most positive pattern of emotional, motivational, and cognitive outcomes. Finally, methodological and educational implications and directions for future research are discussed.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
370 Erziehung, Schul- und Bildungswesen

Schlagwörter

Boredom, Academic emotion, Boredom coping, Scale Development

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690NETT, Ulrike, Thomas GÖTZ, Lia Marie DANIELS, 2010. What to do when feeling bored? : Students' strategies for coping with boredom. In: Learning and Individual Differences. 2010, 20(6), pp. 626-638. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2010.09.004
BibTex
@article{Nett2010feeli-12351,
  year={2010},
  doi={10.1016/j.lindif.2010.09.004},
  title={What to do when feeling bored? : Students' strategies for coping with boredom},
  number={6},
  volume={20},
  journal={Learning and Individual Differences},
  pages={626--638},
  author={Nett, Ulrike and Götz, Thomas and Daniels, Lia Marie}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/12351">
    <dcterms:title>What to do when feeling bored? : Students' strategies for coping with boredom</dcterms:title>
    <dc:creator>Nett, Ulrike</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-25T15:26:14Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/31"/>
    <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>First publ. in: Learning and Individual Differences 20 (2010), 6, pp. 626-638</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
    <dc:creator>Götz, Thomas</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:issued>2010</dcterms:issued>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/12351/1/nettgoetzdaniels.pdf"/>
    <dc:contributor>Daniels, Lia Marie</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Nett, Ulrike</dc:contributor>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:creator>Daniels, Lia Marie</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-12-31T23:25:15Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:contributor>Götz, Thomas</dc:contributor>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/31"/>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/12351/1/nettgoetzdaniels.pdf"/>
    <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/12351"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The goal of this study was to explore different strategies for coping with boredom. A questionnaire was developed targeting two dimensions of coping, namely approach versus avoidance oriented coping and cognitive versus behavioral oriented coping. First, based on the responses of 976 students (51% female) from grades 5 to 10, the structure of the coping with boredom scales was verified by confirmatory factor analysis. In a second step, 3 different boredom-coping groups were identified by latent profile analysis. These three groups were named Reappraisers, Criticizers, and Evaders. Third, differences between these groups concerning their frequency of experiencing boredom, their academic achievement, and other emotional, motivational, and cognitive aspects of academic achievement situations were analyzed. Relative to the other 2 groups, Reappraisers preferred cognitive-approach strategies, were less frequently bored, and experienced the most positive pattern of emotional, motivational, and cognitive outcomes. Finally, methodological and educational implications and directions for future research are discussed.</dcterms:abstract>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen