Publikation:

Prognostic Risk Estimates of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis and Their Physicians : Comparison to an Online Analytical Risk Counseling Tool

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Heesen_280334.pdf
Heesen_280334.pdfGröße: 610.43 KBDownloads: 571

Datum

2013

Autor:innen

Heesen, Christoph
Nguyen, Franziska
Stellmann, Jan-Patrick
Kasper, Jürgen
Köpke, Sascha
Lederer, Christian
Neuhaus, Anneke
Daumer, Martin

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Gold
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

PLoS ONE. 2013, 8(5), e59042. eISSN 1932-6203. Available under: doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059042

Zusammenfassung

Background
Prognostic counseling in multiple sclerosis (MS) is difficult because of the high variability of disease progression. Simultaneously, patients and physicians are increasingly confronted with making treatment decisions at an early stage, which requires taking individual prognoses into account to strike a good balance between benefits and harms of treatments. It is therefore important to understand how patients and physicians estimate prognostic risk, and whether and how these estimates can be improved. An online analytical processing (OLAP) tool based on pooled data from placebo cohorts of clinical trials offers short-term prognostic estimates that can be used for individual risk counseling.


Objective
The aim of this study was to clarify if personalized prognostic information as presented by the OLAP tool is considered useful and meaningful by patients. Furthermore, we used the OLAP tool to evaluate patients' and physicians' risk estimates. Within this evaluation process we assessed short-time prognostic risk estimates of patients with MS (final n = 110) and their physicians (n = 6) and compared them with the estimates of OLAP.


Results
Patients rated the OLAP tool as understandable and acceptable, but to be only of moderate interest. It turned out that patients, physicians, and the OLAP tool ranked patients similarly regarding their risk of disease progression. Both patients' and physicians' estimates correlated most strongly with those disease covariates that the OLAP tool's estimates also correlated with most strongly. Exposure to the OLAP tool did not change patients' risk estimates.


Conclusion
While the OLAP tool was rated understandable and acceptable, it was only of modest interest and did not change patients' prognostic estimates. The results suggest, however, that patients had some idea regarding their prognosis and which factors were most important in this regard. Future work with OLAP should assess long-term prognostic estimates and clarify its usefulness for patients and physicians facing treatment decisions.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
150 Psychologie

Schlagwörter

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690HEESEN, Christoph, Wolfgang GAISSMAIER, Franziska NGUYEN, Jan-Patrick STELLMANN, Jürgen KASPER, Sascha KÖPKE, Christian LEDERER, Anneke NEUHAUS, Martin DAUMER, 2013. Prognostic Risk Estimates of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis and Their Physicians : Comparison to an Online Analytical Risk Counseling Tool. In: PLoS ONE. 2013, 8(5), e59042. eISSN 1932-6203. Available under: doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059042
BibTex
@article{Heesen2013Progn-28033,
  year={2013},
  doi={10.1371/journal.pone.0059042},
  title={Prognostic Risk Estimates of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis and Their Physicians : Comparison to an Online Analytical Risk Counseling Tool},
  number={5},
  volume={8},
  journal={PLoS ONE},
  author={Heesen, Christoph and Gaissmaier, Wolfgang and Nguyen, Franziska and Stellmann, Jan-Patrick and Kasper, Jürgen and Köpke, Sascha and Lederer, Christian and Neuhaus, Anneke and Daumer, Martin},
  note={Article Number: e59042}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28033">
    <dc:contributor>Gaissmaier, Wolfgang</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Kasper, Jürgen</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Kasper, Jürgen</dc:contributor>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/28033"/>
    <dc:creator>Lederer, Christian</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dc:contributor>Stellmann, Jan-Patrick</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Daumer, Martin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2014-06-13T07:08:39Z</dc:date>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/28033/1/Heesen_280334.pdf"/>
    <dc:contributor>Heesen, Christoph</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Neuhaus, Anneke</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:issued>2013</dcterms:issued>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dc:creator>Gaissmaier, Wolfgang</dc:creator>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/28033/1/Heesen_280334.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2014-06-13T07:08:39Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:title>Prognostic Risk Estimates of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis and Their Physicians : Comparison to an Online Analytical Risk Counseling Tool</dcterms:title>
    <dc:contributor>Köpke, Sascha</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dc:creator>Köpke, Sascha</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Neuhaus, Anneke</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Daumer, Martin</dc:contributor>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Lederer, Christian</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Stellmann, Jan-Patrick</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Nguyen, Franziska</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>Plos One ; 8 (2013), 5. - e59042</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:contributor>Nguyen, Franziska</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Background&lt;br /&gt;Prognostic counseling in multiple sclerosis (MS) is difficult because of the high variability of disease progression. Simultaneously, patients and physicians are increasingly confronted with making treatment decisions at an early stage, which requires taking individual prognoses into account to strike a good balance between benefits and harms of treatments. It is therefore important to understand how patients and physicians estimate prognostic risk, and whether and how these estimates can be improved. An online analytical processing (OLAP) tool based on pooled data from placebo cohorts of clinical trials offers short-term prognostic estimates that can be used for individual risk counseling.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Objective&lt;br /&gt;The aim of this study was to clarify if personalized prognostic information as presented by the OLAP tool is considered useful and meaningful by patients. Furthermore, we used the OLAP tool to evaluate patients' and physicians' risk estimates. Within this evaluation process we assessed short-time prognostic risk estimates of patients with MS (final n = 110) and their physicians (n = 6) and compared them with the estimates of OLAP.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Results&lt;br /&gt;Patients rated the OLAP tool as understandable and acceptable, but to be only of moderate interest. It turned out that patients, physicians, and the OLAP tool ranked patients similarly regarding their risk of disease progression. Both patients' and physicians' estimates correlated most strongly with those disease covariates that the OLAP tool's estimates also correlated with most strongly. Exposure to the OLAP tool did not change patients' risk estimates.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Conclusion&lt;br /&gt;While the OLAP tool was rated understandable and acceptable, it was only of modest interest and did not change patients' prognostic estimates. The results suggest, however, that patients had some idea regarding their prognosis and which factors were most important in this regard. Future work with OLAP should assess long-term prognostic estimates and clarify its usefulness for patients and physicians facing treatment decisions.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:creator>Heesen, Christoph</dc:creator>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Nein
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen