Publikation: Pashto (Endo-)clitics in a Parallel Architecture
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
This paper examines the phenomenon of Pashto (endo-)clitics, which are subject to both prosodic and syntactic contraints. These clitics challenge the view of prosody as being derivative from the syntax (e.g. Selkirk 1984) and the Principle of Lexical Integrity (Bresnan and Mchombo 1995) in that Pashto allows clitics to be inserted into the morphological word. However, these challenges can be resolved by assuming an architecture that views syntax and prosody as independent but interacting dimensions of grammar trying to align with each other as much as possible (see B¨ogel et al. (2009) for an approach within LFG). This paper presents data showing that it is the prosodic component that must account for the placement of the clitics within words, which leads to the conclusion that in cases of misalignment, the prosodic component takes precedence over the syntactic component, although this causes a violation of the Principle of Lexical Integrity.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
BÖGEL, Tina, 2010. Pashto (Endo-)clitics in a Parallel Architecture. Fifteenth International Lexical Functional Grammar Conference (LFG10). Ottawa, Canada, 18. Juli 2010 - 20. Juli 2010. In: BUTT, Miriam, ed., Tracy Holloway KING, ed.. Proceedings of the LFG10 Conference. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 2010, pp. 85-105. ISSN 1098-6782BibTex
@inproceedings{Bogel2010Pasht-30062, year={2010}, title={Pashto (Endo-)clitics in a Parallel Architecture}, url={http://web.stanford.edu/group/cslipublications/cslipublications/LFG/15/papers/lfg10boegel.pdf}, issn={1098-6782}, publisher={CSLI Publications}, address={Stanford}, booktitle={Proceedings of the LFG10 Conference}, pages={85--105}, editor={Butt, Miriam and King, Tracy Holloway}, author={Bögel, Tina} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/30062"> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dcterms:title>Pashto (Endo-)clitics in a Parallel Architecture</dcterms:title> <dc:creator>Bögel, Tina</dc:creator> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/30062/3/Boegel_0-278290.pdf"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-02-25T13:38:07Z</dcterms:available> <dcterms:issued>2010</dcterms:issued> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/30062"/> <dc:contributor>Bögel, Tina</dc:contributor> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This paper examines the phenomenon of Pashto (endo-)clitics, which are subject to both prosodic and syntactic contraints. These clitics challenge the view of prosody as being derivative from the syntax (e.g. Selkirk 1984) and the Principle of Lexical Integrity (Bresnan and Mchombo 1995) in that Pashto allows clitics to be inserted into the morphological word. However, these challenges can be resolved by assuming an architecture that views syntax and prosody as independent but interacting dimensions of grammar trying to align with each other as much as possible (see B¨ogel et al. (2009) for an approach within LFG). This paper presents data showing that it is the prosodic component that must account for the placement of the clitics within words, which leads to the conclusion that in cases of misalignment, the prosodic component takes precedence over the syntactic component, although this causes a violation of the Principle of Lexical Integrity.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-02-25T13:38:07Z</dc:date> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/30062/3/Boegel_0-278290.pdf"/> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>