Publikation: Abduction or Inertia? : The logic of syntactic change
Lade...
Dateien
Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.
Datum
2010
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Beitrag zu einem Konferenzband
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
CUMMINS, Chris, ed., Chi-Hé ELDER, ed., Thomas GODARD, ed., Morgan MACLEOD, ed., Elaine SCHMIDT, ed., George WALKDEN, ed.. CAMling 2010 : Proceedings of the Sixth Cambridge Postgraduate Conference in Language Research. Cambridge: Cambridge Institute of Language Research (CILR), 2010, pp. 230-239
Zusammenfassung
Two assumptions often considered principles of inquiry in historical generative syntax are that linguistic change is abductive (Andersen 1973) and that syntax is inert (Longobardi 2001). In this paper it is demonstrated that these two notions, if meaningfully interpreted, are not compatible: if we wish to develop a coherent theory of language acquisition and change, we must abandon one or the other. The conclusion reached is that that neither abduction nor inertia is a necessary or useful concept in diachronic syntax. I suggest that we should abandon both, instead treating syntactic change on its own terms.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
400 Sprachwissenschaft, Linguistik
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
CAMling 2010 : Sixth Cambridge Postgraduate Conference in Language Research, 7. Dez. 2010 - 8. Dez. 2010, Cambridge
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690
WALKDEN, George, 2010. Abduction or Inertia? : The logic of syntactic change. CAMling 2010 : Sixth Cambridge Postgraduate Conference in Language Research. Cambridge, 7. Dez. 2010 - 8. Dez. 2010. In: CUMMINS, Chris, ed., Chi-Hé ELDER, ed., Thomas GODARD, ed., Morgan MACLEOD, ed., Elaine SCHMIDT, ed., George WALKDEN, ed.. CAMling 2010 : Proceedings of the Sixth Cambridge Postgraduate Conference in Language Research. Cambridge: Cambridge Institute of Language Research (CILR), 2010, pp. 230-239BibTex
@inproceedings{Walkden2010Abduc-38994,
year={2010},
title={Abduction or Inertia? : The logic of syntactic change},
url={http://www.srcf.ucam.org/camling/proceedings/walkden.pdf},
publisher={Cambridge Institute of Language Research (CILR)},
address={Cambridge},
booktitle={CAMling 2010 : Proceedings of the Sixth Cambridge Postgraduate Conference in Language Research},
pages={230--239},
editor={Cummins, Chris and Elder, Chi-Hé and Godard, Thomas and Macleod, Morgan and Schmidt, Elaine and Walkden, George},
author={Walkden, George}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/38994">
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dc:creator>Walkden, George</dc:creator>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-05-22T11:19:08Z</dcterms:available>
<dcterms:title>Abduction or Inertia? : The logic of syntactic change</dcterms:title>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/38994"/>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-05-22T11:19:08Z</dc:date>
<dcterms:issued>2010</dcterms:issued>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<dc:contributor>Walkden, George</dc:contributor>
<dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Two assumptions often considered principles of inquiry in historical generative syntax are that linguistic change is abductive (Andersen 1973) and that syntax is inert (Longobardi 2001). In this paper it is demonstrated that these two notions, if meaningfully interpreted, are not compatible: if we wish to develop a coherent theory of language acquisition and change, we must abandon one or the other. The conclusion reached is that that neither abduction nor inertia is a necessary or useful concept in diachronic syntax. I suggest that we should abandon both, instead treating syntactic change on its own terms.</dcterms:abstract>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
URL der Originalveröffentl.
Prüfdatum der URL
2017-05-22
