Publikation:

A Brief Comparison of Pollock's Defeasible Reasoning and Ranking Functions

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Datum

2002

Autor:innen

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Synthese. 2002, 131, pp. 39-56. Available under: doi: 10.1023/A:1015004212541

Zusammenfassung

For more than 20 years John Pollock is elaborating a detailed account of defeasible reasoning. Ranking theory as developed by me in Spohn (1988) "Ordinal Conditional Functions. A Dynamic Theory of Epistemic States" (but see also Spohn (2001) "Deterministic Causation") offers such an account, too. The paper first gives a very brief informal sketch of the two accounts. It then explains that the basic difference is that Pollock's theory is entirely computational, whereas mine is located at a regulative level. It continues to argue that Pollock's theory cannot bridge this difference and that its normative condition is therefore deficient. The final section shows, by contrast, that ranking theory provides ample means to bridge the difference.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
100 Philosophie

Schlagwörter

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690SPOHN, Wolfgang, 2002. A Brief Comparison of Pollock's Defeasible Reasoning and Ranking Functions. In: Synthese. 2002, 131, pp. 39-56. Available under: doi: 10.1023/A:1015004212541
BibTex
@article{Spohn2002Brief-3477,
  year={2002},
  doi={10.1023/A:1015004212541},
  title={A Brief Comparison of Pollock's Defeasible Reasoning and Ranking Functions},
  volume={131},
  journal={Synthese},
  pages={39--56},
  author={Spohn, Wolfgang}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/3477">
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/3477"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <dcterms:title>A Brief Comparison of Pollock's Defeasible Reasoning and Ranking Functions</dcterms:title>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-23T13:46:29Z</dc:date>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-23T13:46:29Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>First publ. in: Synthese 131 (2002), pp. 39-56</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/3477/1/A_Brief_Comparison_of_Pollocks_Defeasible_Reasoning_and_Ranking_Functions.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">For more than 20 years John Pollock is elaborating a detailed account of defeasible reasoning. Ranking theory as developed by me in Spohn (1988) "Ordinal Conditional Functions. A Dynamic Theory of Epistemic States" (but see also Spohn (2001) "Deterministic Causation") offers such an account, too. The paper first gives a very brief informal sketch of the two accounts. It then explains that the basic difference is that Pollock's theory is entirely computational, whereas mine is located at a regulative level. It continues to argue that Pollock's theory cannot bridge this difference and that its normative condition is therefore deficient. The final section shows, by contrast, that ranking theory provides ample means to bridge the difference.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:creator>Spohn, Wolfgang</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:issued>2002</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:contributor>Spohn, Wolfgang</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/3477/1/A_Brief_Comparison_of_Pollocks_Defeasible_Reasoning_and_Ranking_Functions.pdf"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Nein
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen