Sharing Responsibility : The German Federal Court of Justice and the Civil Appellate System
| dc.contributor.author | Stürner, Michael | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T13:26:15Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-06-17T13:26:15Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | eng |
| dc.description.abstract | When evaluating the role of Supreme Courts the main problem consists in finding the right balance between the goal of doing justice in the individual case and the overarching responsibility of every Supreme Court to clarify and develop the law. The history of reforms of access to the German Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof) can be seen as a constant attempt to redefine this equilibrium; sometimes one aspect is given more emphasis, sometimes the other. In Germany, traditionally, much weight has been placed on the goal of individual justice. However, in recent decades the collective aspects of Revision have been strengthened. The major reform of 2001 not only introduced restrictions on access to the Federal Court of Justice, but also reshaped the entire procedural system, giving more weight to the first instance. This has led to a significant reduction in the caseload of the Federal Court of Justice. | eng |
| dc.description.version | published | de |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/978-3-030-63731-6_5 | eng |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/54010 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | eng |
| dc.rights | terms-of-use | |
| dc.rights.uri | https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/ | |
| dc.subject | Federal Court of Justice, Clarification and development of the law, Revision | eng |
| dc.subject.ddc | 340 | eng |
| dc.title | Sharing Responsibility : The German Federal Court of Justice and the Civil Appellate System | eng |
| dc.type | INCOLLECTION | de |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| kops.citation.bibtex | @incollection{Sturner2021Shari-54010,
year={2021},
doi={10.1007/978-3-030-63731-6_5},
title={Sharing Responsibility : The German Federal Court of Justice and the Civil Appellate System},
number={83},
isbn={978-3-030-63730-9},
publisher={Springer},
address={Cham},
series={Ius Gentium : Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice},
booktitle={Supreme Courts Under Pressure : Controlling Caseload in the Administration of Civil Justice},
pages={75--103},
editor={Bravo-Hurtado, Pablo and van Rhee, Cornelis Hendrik},
author={Stürner, Michael}
} | |
| kops.citation.iso690 | STÜRNER, Michael, 2021. Sharing Responsibility : The German Federal Court of Justice and the Civil Appellate System. In: BRAVO-HURTADO, Pablo, ed., Cornelis Hendrik VAN RHEE, ed.. Supreme Courts Under Pressure : Controlling Caseload in the Administration of Civil Justice. Cham: Springer, 2021, pp. 75-103. Ius Gentium : Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice. 83. ISBN 978-3-030-63730-9. Available under: doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-63731-6_5 | deu |
| kops.citation.iso690 | STÜRNER, Michael, 2021. Sharing Responsibility : The German Federal Court of Justice and the Civil Appellate System. In: BRAVO-HURTADO, Pablo, ed., Cornelis Hendrik VAN RHEE, ed.. Supreme Courts Under Pressure : Controlling Caseload in the Administration of Civil Justice. Cham: Springer, 2021, pp. 75-103. Ius Gentium : Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice. 83. ISBN 978-3-030-63730-9. Available under: doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-63731-6_5 | eng |
| kops.citation.rdf | <rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/54010">
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">When evaluating the role of Supreme Courts the main problem consists in finding the right balance between the goal of doing justice in the individual case and the overarching responsibility of every Supreme Court to clarify and develop the law. The history of reforms of access to the German Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof) can be seen as a constant attempt to redefine this equilibrium; sometimes one aspect is given more emphasis, sometimes the other. In Germany, traditionally, much weight has been placed on the goal of individual justice. However, in recent decades the collective aspects of Revision have been strengthened. The major reform of 2001 not only introduced restrictions on access to the Federal Court of Justice, but also reshaped the entire procedural system, giving more weight to the first instance. This has led to a significant reduction in the caseload of the Federal Court of Justice.</dcterms:abstract>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-06-17T13:26:15Z</dc:date>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/44"/>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:contributor>Stürner, Michael</dc:contributor>
<dc:creator>Stürner, Michael</dc:creator>
<dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
<dcterms:title>Sharing Responsibility : The German Federal Court of Justice and the Civil Appellate System</dcterms:title>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-06-17T13:26:15Z</dcterms:available>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/44"/>
<dcterms:issued>2021</dcterms:issued>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/54010"/>
<dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF> | |
| kops.flag.knbibliography | true | |
| kops.sourcefield | BRAVO-HURTADO, Pablo, ed., Cornelis Hendrik VAN RHEE, ed.. <i>Supreme Courts Under Pressure : Controlling Caseload in the Administration of Civil Justice</i>. Cham: Springer, 2021, pp. 75-103. Ius Gentium : Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice. 83. ISBN 978-3-030-63730-9. Available under: doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-63731-6_5 | deu |
| kops.sourcefield.plain | BRAVO-HURTADO, Pablo, ed., Cornelis Hendrik VAN RHEE, ed.. Supreme Courts Under Pressure : Controlling Caseload in the Administration of Civil Justice. Cham: Springer, 2021, pp. 75-103. Ius Gentium : Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice. 83. ISBN 978-3-030-63730-9. Available under: doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-63731-6_5 | deu |
| kops.sourcefield.plain | BRAVO-HURTADO, Pablo, ed., Cornelis Hendrik VAN RHEE, ed.. Supreme Courts Under Pressure : Controlling Caseload in the Administration of Civil Justice. Cham: Springer, 2021, pp. 75-103. Ius Gentium : Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice. 83. ISBN 978-3-030-63730-9. Available under: doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-63731-6_5 | eng |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | a9480a5f-a50c-4325-b5bc-21cfd492f686 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | a9480a5f-a50c-4325-b5bc-21cfd492f686 | |
| source.bibliographicInfo.fromPage | 75 | eng |
| source.bibliographicInfo.seriesNumber | 83 | eng |
| source.bibliographicInfo.toPage | 103 | eng |
| source.contributor.editor | Bravo-Hurtado, Pablo | |
| source.contributor.editor | van Rhee, Cornelis Hendrik | |
| source.identifier.isbn | 978-3-030-63730-9 | eng |
| source.publisher | Springer | eng |
| source.publisher.location | Cham | eng |
| source.relation.ispartofseries | Ius Gentium : Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice | eng |
| source.title | Supreme Courts Under Pressure : Controlling Caseload in the Administration of Civil Justice | eng |