Publikation: Sharing Responsibility : The German Federal Court of Justice and the Civil Appellate System
Lade...
Dateien
Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.
Datum
2021
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Beitrag zu einem Sammelband
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
BRAVO-HURTADO, Pablo, ed., Cornelis Hendrik VAN RHEE, ed.. Supreme Courts Under Pressure : Controlling Caseload in the Administration of Civil Justice. Cham: Springer, 2021, pp. 75-103. Ius Gentium : Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice. 83. ISBN 978-3-030-63730-9. Available under: doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-63731-6_5
Zusammenfassung
When evaluating the role of Supreme Courts the main problem consists in finding the right balance between the goal of doing justice in the individual case and the overarching responsibility of every Supreme Court to clarify and develop the law. The history of reforms of access to the German Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof) can be seen as a constant attempt to redefine this equilibrium; sometimes one aspect is given more emphasis, sometimes the other. In Germany, traditionally, much weight has been placed on the goal of individual justice. However, in recent decades the collective aspects of Revision have been strengthened. The major reform of 2001 not only introduced restrictions on access to the Federal Court of Justice, but also reshaped the entire procedural system, giving more weight to the first instance. This has led to a significant reduction in the caseload of the Federal Court of Justice.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
340 Recht
Schlagwörter
Federal Court of Justice, Clarification and development of the law, Revision
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690
STÜRNER, Michael, 2021. Sharing Responsibility : The German Federal Court of Justice and the Civil Appellate System. In: BRAVO-HURTADO, Pablo, ed., Cornelis Hendrik VAN RHEE, ed.. Supreme Courts Under Pressure : Controlling Caseload in the Administration of Civil Justice. Cham: Springer, 2021, pp. 75-103. Ius Gentium : Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice. 83. ISBN 978-3-030-63730-9. Available under: doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-63731-6_5BibTex
@incollection{Sturner2021Shari-54010,
year={2021},
doi={10.1007/978-3-030-63731-6_5},
title={Sharing Responsibility : The German Federal Court of Justice and the Civil Appellate System},
number={83},
isbn={978-3-030-63730-9},
publisher={Springer},
address={Cham},
series={Ius Gentium : Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice},
booktitle={Supreme Courts Under Pressure : Controlling Caseload in the Administration of Civil Justice},
pages={75--103},
editor={Bravo-Hurtado, Pablo and van Rhee, Cornelis Hendrik},
author={Stürner, Michael}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/54010">
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">When evaluating the role of Supreme Courts the main problem consists in finding the right balance between the goal of doing justice in the individual case and the overarching responsibility of every Supreme Court to clarify and develop the law. The history of reforms of access to the German Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof) can be seen as a constant attempt to redefine this equilibrium; sometimes one aspect is given more emphasis, sometimes the other. In Germany, traditionally, much weight has been placed on the goal of individual justice. However, in recent decades the collective aspects of Revision have been strengthened. The major reform of 2001 not only introduced restrictions on access to the Federal Court of Justice, but also reshaped the entire procedural system, giving more weight to the first instance. This has led to a significant reduction in the caseload of the Federal Court of Justice.</dcterms:abstract>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-06-17T13:26:15Z</dc:date>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/44"/>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:contributor>Stürner, Michael</dc:contributor>
<dc:creator>Stürner, Michael</dc:creator>
<dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
<dcterms:title>Sharing Responsibility : The German Federal Court of Justice and the Civil Appellate System</dcterms:title>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-06-17T13:26:15Z</dcterms:available>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/44"/>
<dcterms:issued>2021</dcterms:issued>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/54010"/>
<dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
