Publikation:

Meditation, Not Information? : a Survey Experiment Probing the Effects of Meditation Practice on Affective Polarization and Pro-Environmentalism

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Ramstetter_2-1lx7bh8xeuc6g0.pdf
Ramstetter_2-1lx7bh8xeuc6g0.pdfGröße: 1009.82 KBDownloads: 15

Datum

2025

Autor:innen

Ramstetter, Lena
Klackl, Johannes
Jonas, Eva

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Link zur Lizenz

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Hybrid
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Mindfulness. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. 2025, 16(2), S. 507-524. ISSN 1868-8527. eISSN 1868-8535. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1007/s12671-025-02525-8

Zusammenfassung

Objectives
Climate change is one of the most pressing issues of our time. However, current policies are insufficient to keep climate change at manageable levels. In the United States, this is partly because attitudes and opinions on climate change have become increasingly divided along political party lines, making effective policymaking difficult. The existing literature has focused chiefly on cognitive (i.e., informational) approaches to increasing climate change awareness, which are often counterproductive due to patterns of biased information processing. We examined whether meditation can reduce affective polarization and the partisan divide on climate change.
Method
Using a preregistered survey experiment with 500 US respondents, we investigated whether a short (10-min) meditation practice would render partisans less polarized and more pro-environmental. Participants completed either a mindfulness meditation practice designed to cultivate awareness of thoughts and sensations, a loving-kindness meditation practice designed to cultivate unconditional love and compassion, or no meditation.
Results
Self-identified Republicans who completed the loving-kindness meditation subsequently reported significantly lower polarization scores compared to Republicans who did not meditate. Surprisingly, self-identified Democrats who completed the mindfulness meditation exhibited higher anthropocentrism than Democrats who did not meditate. This suggests that mindfulness meditation may, in some cases, reduce some aspects of pro-environmentalism.
Conclusions
Our results suggest that a short loving-kindness meditation can reduce polarization among Republicans. A form of mindfulness that cultivates awareness of thoughts and sensations but not interpersonal connectedness can have unintended side effects by fostering an anthropocentric worldview among Democrats.
Preregistration
This study was preregistered (https://osf.io/nza78).

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
320 Politik

Schlagwörter

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690RAMSTETTER, Lena, Johannes KLACKL, Eva JONAS, Gabriele SPILKER, 2025. Meditation, Not Information? : a Survey Experiment Probing the Effects of Meditation Practice on Affective Polarization and Pro-Environmentalism. In: Mindfulness. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. 2025, 16(2), S. 507-524. ISSN 1868-8527. eISSN 1868-8535. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1007/s12671-025-02525-8
BibTex
@article{Ramstetter2025-02Medit-72431,
  title={Meditation, Not Information? : a Survey Experiment Probing the Effects of Meditation Practice on Affective Polarization and Pro-Environmentalism},
  year={2025},
  doi={10.1007/s12671-025-02525-8},
  number={2},
  volume={16},
  issn={1868-8527},
  journal={Mindfulness},
  pages={507--524},
  author={Ramstetter, Lena and Klackl, Johannes and Jonas, Eva and Spilker, Gabriele}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/72431">
    <dc:creator>Spilker, Gabriele</dc:creator>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/72431"/>
    <dcterms:title>Meditation, Not Information? : a Survey Experiment Probing the Effects of Meditation Practice on Affective Polarization and Pro-Environmentalism</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:issued>2025-02</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
    <dc:creator>Klackl, Johannes</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Ramstetter, Lena</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/72431/1/Ramstetter_2-1lx7bh8xeuc6g0.pdf"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dc:contributor>Klackl, Johannes</dc:contributor>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43613"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2025-02-24T07:59:52Z</dc:date>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Spilker, Gabriele</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Ramstetter, Lena</dc:creator>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/72431/1/Ramstetter_2-1lx7bh8xeuc6g0.pdf"/>
    <dc:contributor>Jonas, Eva</dc:contributor>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43613"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2025-02-24T07:59:52Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>Jonas, Eva</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:abstract>Objectives       
Climate change is one of the most pressing issues of our time. However, current policies are insufficient to keep climate change at manageable levels. In the United States, this is partly because attitudes and opinions on climate change have become increasingly divided along political party lines, making effective policymaking difficult. The existing literature has focused chiefly on cognitive (i.e., informational) approaches to increasing climate change awareness, which are often counterproductive due to patterns of biased information processing. We examined whether meditation can reduce affective polarization and the partisan divide on climate change.                    
Method        
Using a preregistered survey experiment with 500 US respondents, we investigated whether a short (10-min) meditation practice would render partisans less polarized and more pro-environmental. Participants completed either a mindfulness meditation practice designed to cultivate awareness of thoughts and sensations, a loving-kindness meditation practice designed to cultivate unconditional love and compassion, or no meditation.                    
Results        
Self-identified Republicans who completed the loving-kindness meditation subsequently reported significantly lower polarization scores compared to Republicans who did not meditate. Surprisingly, self-identified Democrats who completed the mindfulness meditation exhibited higher anthropocentrism than Democrats who did not meditate. This suggests that mindfulness meditation may, in some cases, reduce some aspects of pro-environmentalism.                    
Conclusions        
Our results suggest that a short loving-kindness meditation can reduce polarization among Republicans. A form of mindfulness that cultivates awareness of thoughts and sensations but not interpersonal connectedness can have unintended side effects by fostering an anthropocentric worldview among Democrats.                    
Preregistration        
This study was preregistered (https://osf.io/nza78).</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Ja
Diese Publikation teilen