Is anti-Semitism a homogeneous construct?

Thumbnail Image
Files
63.pdf(206.87 KB)
Date
2009
Authors
Editors
Contact
Journal ISSN
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliographical data
Publisher
Series
Diskussionsbeiträge der Projektgruppe Friedensforschung; 63
URI (citable link)
urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-opus-87919
DOI (citable link)
ArXiv-ID
International patent number
Link to the license
In Copyright
EU project number
Project
Open Access publication
Collections
Psychologie
Restricted until
Title in another language
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Publication type
Working Paper/Technical Report
Publication status
Published in
Abstract
The present paper investigates how the distinction of different facets of anti-Semitism is to be understood from a methodological point of view. Does it mean that there is a unique (quantitative) dimension of anti-Semitism on which the participants can be ordered due to a variety of expressions of anti-Semitic prejudice, or does it imply that these facets are independent dimensions of anti-Semitism, which combine themselves into (qualitatively) different syndromes of anti-Semitism?
After discussing various methodological approaches to the analysis of homogeneity vs. inhomogeneity of tests or questionnaires, the paper applies these methodologies to data from an anti-Semitism survey by Petzold (2004) and comes to the conclusion that the facets are no independent constructs. All of them are indicators of one and the same anti-Semitic attitude whose expression is partly modified during the strengthening of anti-Semitic prejudice, however.
Summary in another language
The present paper investigates how the distinction of different facets of anti-Semitism is to be understood from a methodological point of view. Does it mean that there is a unique (quantitative) dimension of anti-Semitism on which the participants can be ordered due to a variety of expressions of anti-Semitic prejudice, or does it imply that these facets are independent dimensions of anti-Semitism, which combine themselves into (qualitatively) different syndromes of anti-Semitism?
After discussing various methodological approaches to the analysis of homogeneity vs. inhomogeneity of tests or questionnaires, the paper applies these methodologies to data from an anti-Semitism survey by Petzold (2004) and comes to the conclusion that the facets are no independent constructs. All of them are indicators of one and the same anti-Semitic attitude whose expression is partly modified during the strengthening of anti-Semitic prejudice, however.
Subject (DDC)
150 Psychology
Keywords
Antisemitismusforschung,Item-Response-Modelle,Anti-Semitism Research,Item-Response-Models,Attitude Measurement
Conference
Review
undefined / . - undefined, undefined. - (undefined; undefined)
Cite This
ISO 690KEMPF, Wilhelm, 2009. Is anti-Semitism a homogeneous construct?
BibTex
@techreport{Kempf2009antiS-10306,
  year={2009},
  series={Diskussionsbeiträge der Projektgruppe Friedensforschung},
  title={Is anti-Semitism a homogeneous construct?},
  number={63},
  author={Kempf, Wilhelm}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/10306">
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/10306"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/10306/1/63.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-25T09:15:54Z</dcterms:available>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The present paper investigates how the distinction of different facets of anti-Semitism is to be understood from a methodological point of view. Does it mean that there is a unique (quantitative) dimension of anti-Semitism on which the participants can be ordered due to a variety of expressions of anti-Semitic prejudice, or does it imply that these facets are independent dimensions of anti-Semitism, which combine themselves into (qualitatively) different syndromes of anti-Semitism?&lt;br /&gt;After discussing various methodological approaches to the analysis of homogeneity vs. inhomogeneity of tests or questionnaires, the paper applies these methodologies to data from an anti-Semitism survey by Petzold (2004) and comes to the conclusion that the facets are no independent constructs. All of them are indicators of one and the same anti-Semitic attitude whose expression is partly modified during the strengthening of anti-Semitic prejudice, however.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:issued>2009</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:creator>Kempf, Wilhelm</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/10306/1/63.pdf"/>
    <dc:contributor>Kempf, Wilhelm</dc:contributor>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-25T09:15:54Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:title>Is anti-Semitism a homogeneous construct?</dcterms:title>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
Internal note
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Contact
URL of original publication
Test date of URL
Examination date of dissertation
Method of financing
Comment on publication
Alliance license
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
International Co-Authors
Bibliography of Konstanz
Yes
Refereed