Publikation:

Carnap versus Quine, or Aprioristic versus Naturalized Epistemology, or a Lesson from Dispositions

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Spohn_2003_Carnap_versus.pdf
Spohn_2003_Carnap_versus.pdfGröße: 124.73 KBDownloads: 350

Datum

2003

Autor:innen

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Beitrag zu einem Sammelband
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

BONK, Thomas, ed.. Language, Truth and Knowledge: Contributions to the Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2003, pp. 167-177

Zusammenfassung

In his influential paper "Epistemology Naturalized" Quine argues that Carnap's failure to define disposition predicates and his subsequent preference for reduction sentences naturally lead to an entirely naturalized epistemology. This conclusion is too hasty, I object. Applying the account of dispositional predicates developed in No. 26 I defend Carnap's aprioristic epistemology against Quine's attacks.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
100 Philosophie

Schlagwörter

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690SPOHN, Wolfgang, 2003. Carnap versus Quine, or Aprioristic versus Naturalized Epistemology, or a Lesson from Dispositions. In: BONK, Thomas, ed.. Language, Truth and Knowledge: Contributions to the Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2003, pp. 167-177
BibTex
@incollection{Spohn2003Carna-3497,
  year={2003},
  title={Carnap versus Quine, or Aprioristic versus Naturalized Epistemology, or a Lesson from Dispositions},
  publisher={Kluwer},
  address={Dordrecht},
  booktitle={Language, Truth and Knowledge: Contributions to the Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap},
  pages={167--177},
  editor={Bonk, Thomas},
  author={Spohn, Wolfgang}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/3497">
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:issued>2003</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-23T13:46:33Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic</dc:rights>
    <dc:creator>Spohn, Wolfgang</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">In his influential paper "Epistemology Naturalized" Quine argues that Carnap's failure to define disposition predicates and his subsequent preference for reduction sentences naturally lead to an entirely naturalized epistemology. This conclusion is too hasty, I object. Applying the account of dispositional predicates developed in No. 26 I defend Carnap's aprioristic epistemology against Quine's attacks.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
    <dc:contributor>Spohn, Wolfgang</dc:contributor>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/3497/1/Spohn_2003_Carnap_versus.pdf"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-23T13:46:33Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>First publ. in: Language, Truth and Knowledge: Contributions to the Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap / Thomas Bonk (ed.). - Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2003, pp. 167-177</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/3497/1/Spohn_2003_Carnap_versus.pdf"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:title>Carnap versus Quine, or Aprioristic versus Naturalized Epistemology, or a Lesson from Dispositions</dcterms:title>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/3497"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen