Publikation:

Variable use of polyadic grooming and its effect on access to social partners in wild chimpanzees and bonobos

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Girard-Buttoz_2-1khh2q6tig6402.pdf
Girard-Buttoz_2-1khh2q6tig6402.pdfGröße: 620.05 KBDownloads: 56

Datum

2020

Autor:innen

Girard-Buttoz, Cédric
Surbeck, Martin
Samuni, Liran
Boesch, Christophe
Crockford, Catherine
Hohmann, Gottfried
Wittig, Roman M.

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Link zur Lizenz

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Hybrid
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Animal Behaviour. Elsevier. 2020, 168, pp. 211-224. ISSN 0003-3472. eISSN 1095-8282. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2020.08.021

Zusammenfassung

In mammals, allogrooming is prominent in forming and maintaining social and cooperative relationships. Yet an animal's social time is constrained, which may limit its access to a large number of partners. Dunbar (1993, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16 (4), 681–694) proposed that human polyadic conversations, which allow access to several social partners simultaneously, evolved as a form of social grooming to circumvent this time constraint. In nonhuman primates, polyadic grooming (PG), in contrast to dyadic grooming, may similarly be a time-efficient way to maintain weak social relationships with many partners which can be important for group level cooperation. It remains unknown whether PG is used to fulfil specific cooperative needs by accessing numerous weakly bonded partners and increasing the number of partners accessed per unit of time. We compared the use and effect of PG between chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes, which are highly territorial and collaborative (especially males), and bonobos, Pan paniscus, which are less territorial and collaborative and in which females are the main co-operators. We carried out focal grooming observations in one bonobo and two chimpanzee communities in the wild. As predicted, chimpanzees engaged in more PG than bonobos. Surprisingly, males engaged in PG more than females in both species. While chimpanzees accessed more partners per minute of grooming than bonobos via dyadic grooming, PG increased the number of partners accessed per minute only in bonobos. Finally, chimpanzees primarily used PG with individuals who were close in rank and frequent grooming partners, whereas bonobos used PG with individuals who were distant in rank, close party associates and frequent grooming partners. We suggest that bonobo males use PG to enhance conspecific social tolerance and mate choice. The overall higher rate of PG in chimpanzees suggests that between-group competition may promote polyadic affiliation, which possibly reinforces group cohesion and coordination.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
570 Biowissenschaften, Biologie

Schlagwörter

affiliation, cooperation, Dunbar, mammals, Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, partner choice, social relationship, territoriality, weak ties

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690GIRARD-BUTTOZ, Cédric, Martin SURBECK, Liran SAMUNI, Christophe BOESCH, Barbara FRUTH, Catherine CROCKFORD, Gottfried HOHMANN, Roman M. WITTIG, 2020. Variable use of polyadic grooming and its effect on access to social partners in wild chimpanzees and bonobos. In: Animal Behaviour. Elsevier. 2020, 168, pp. 211-224. ISSN 0003-3472. eISSN 1095-8282. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2020.08.021
BibTex
@article{GirardButtoz2020-10Varia-57201,
  year={2020},
  doi={10.1016/j.anbehav.2020.08.021},
  title={Variable use of polyadic grooming and its effect on access to social partners in wild chimpanzees and bonobos},
  volume={168},
  issn={0003-3472},
  journal={Animal Behaviour},
  pages={211--224},
  author={Girard-Buttoz, Cédric and Surbeck, Martin and Samuni, Liran and Boesch, Christophe and Fruth, Barbara and Crockford, Catherine and Hohmann, Gottfried and Wittig, Roman M.}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/57201">
    <dc:creator>Fruth, Barbara</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/"/>
    <dc:creator>Hohmann, Gottfried</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Wittig, Roman M.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Girard-Buttoz, Cédric</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Surbeck, Martin</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-04-07T08:02:58Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:contributor>Boesch, Christophe</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Samuni, Liran</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Surbeck, Martin</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:issued>2020-10</dcterms:issued>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/57201/1/Girard-Buttoz_2-1khh2q6tig6402.pdf"/>
    <dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International</dc:rights>
    <dc:contributor>Fruth, Barbara</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/57201/1/Girard-Buttoz_2-1khh2q6tig6402.pdf"/>
    <dc:creator>Crockford, Catherine</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:title>Variable use of polyadic grooming and its effect on access to social partners in wild chimpanzees and bonobos</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <dc:creator>Girard-Buttoz, Cédric</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Crockford, Catherine</dc:contributor>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:contributor>Hohmann, Gottfried</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Wittig, Roman M.</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Samuni, Liran</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Boesch, Christophe</dc:creator>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-04-07T08:02:58Z</dc:date>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/57201"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">In mammals, allogrooming is prominent in forming and maintaining social and cooperative relationships. Yet an animal's social time is constrained, which may limit its access to a large number of partners. Dunbar (1993, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16 (4), 681–694) proposed that human polyadic conversations, which allow access to several social partners simultaneously, evolved as a form of social grooming to circumvent this time constraint. In nonhuman primates, polyadic grooming (PG), in contrast to dyadic grooming, may similarly be a time-efficient way to maintain weak social relationships with many partners which can be important for group level cooperation. It remains unknown whether PG is used to fulfil specific cooperative needs by accessing numerous weakly bonded partners and increasing the number of partners accessed per unit of time. We compared the use and effect of PG between chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes, which are highly territorial and collaborative (especially males), and bonobos, Pan paniscus, which are less territorial and collaborative and in which females are the main co-operators. We carried out focal grooming observations in one bonobo and two chimpanzee communities in the wild. As predicted, chimpanzees engaged in more PG than bonobos. Surprisingly, males engaged in PG more than females in both species. While chimpanzees accessed more partners per minute of grooming than bonobos via dyadic grooming, PG increased the number of partners accessed per minute only in bonobos. Finally, chimpanzees primarily used PG with individuals who were close in rank and frequent grooming partners, whereas bonobos used PG with individuals who were distant in rank, close party associates and frequent grooming partners. We suggest that bonobo males use PG to enhance conspecific social tolerance and mate choice. The overall higher rate of PG in chimpanzees suggests that between-group competition may promote polyadic affiliation, which possibly reinforces group cohesion and coordination.</dcterms:abstract>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Begutachtet
Ja
Diese Publikation teilen