Publikation: Varieties of Class-Theoretic Potentialism
Lade...
Dateien
Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.
Datum
2023
Autor:innen
Williams, Kameryn J.
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
The Review of Symbolic Logic. Cambridge University Press. 2023, 17(1), S. 272-304. ISSN 1755-0203. eISSN 1755-0211. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1017/S1755020323000126
Zusammenfassung
We explain and explore class-theoretic potentialism—the view that one can always individuate more classes over a set-theoretic universe. We examine some motivations for class-theoretic potentialism, before proving some results concerning the relevant potentialist systems (in particular exhibiting failures of the .2 and .3 axioms). We then discuss the significance of these results for the different kinds of class-theoretic potentialists.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
100 Philosophie
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690
BARTON, Neil, Kameryn J. WILLIAMS, 2023. Varieties of Class-Theoretic Potentialism. In: The Review of Symbolic Logic. Cambridge University Press. 2023, 17(1), S. 272-304. ISSN 1755-0203. eISSN 1755-0211. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1017/S1755020323000126BibTex
@article{Barton2023Varie-75968,
title={Varieties of Class-Theoretic Potentialism},
year={2023},
doi={10.1017/S1755020323000126},
number={1},
volume={17},
issn={1755-0203},
journal={The Review of Symbolic Logic},
pages={272--304},
author={Barton, Neil and Williams, Kameryn J.}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/75968">
<dc:contributor>Barton, Neil</dc:contributor>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
<dc:contributor>Williams, Kameryn J.</dc:contributor>
<dc:creator>Williams, Kameryn J.</dc:creator>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/75968"/>
<dc:creator>Barton, Neil</dc:creator>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2026-01-28T13:44:15Z</dcterms:available>
<dcterms:issued>2023</dcterms:issued>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<dcterms:abstract>We explain and explore class-theoretic potentialism—the view that one can always individuate more classes over a set-theoretic universe. We examine some motivations for class-theoretic potentialism, before proving some results concerning the relevant potentialist systems (in particular exhibiting failures of the .2 and .3 axioms). We then discuss the significance of these results for the different kinds of class-theoretic potentialists.</dcterms:abstract>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2026-01-28T13:44:15Z</dc:date>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
<dcterms:title>Varieties of Class-Theoretic Potentialism</dcterms:title>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Nein
Begutachtet
Ja