Publikation:

Assessing Reliability, Validity, and Clinical Utility of the BEST-Index in Measuring Living Skills Among Forensic Inpatients

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

Datum

2012

Autor:innen

Reed, Val
Pfäfflin, Friedemann

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

URI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 2012, 56(3), pp. 385-400. ISSN 0306-624X. eISSN 1552-6933. Available under: doi: 10.1177/0306624X11410150

Zusammenfassung

The assessment of behavioral change as a result of inpatient treatment in forensic psychiatry is an important precondition for violence risk prediction in forensic psychiatry. In relation to a multitude of diagnostically based risk assessment instruments, there is a shortage of appropriate instruments with which to carry out valid and reliable therapeutic assessments that are behaviorally based and therefore appropriate for use within varied psychiatric contexts. There is also a need for instruments which will offer assessors the opportunity to examine possible relationships between criteria of social risk and criteria of more general aspects of social functioning. Tapping the issues pointed out above, the authors present an overview of a normatively based social profiling instrument (the BEST-Index), and discuss evidence for its validity, reliability, and aspects of clinical utility.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
150 Psychologie

Schlagwörter

risk management, offender treatment, forensic psychotherapy, BEST-Index

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690ROSS, Thomas, Val REED, Maria Isabel FONTAO, Friedemann PFÄFFLIN, 2012. Assessing Reliability, Validity, and Clinical Utility of the BEST-Index in Measuring Living Skills Among Forensic Inpatients. In: International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 2012, 56(3), pp. 385-400. ISSN 0306-624X. eISSN 1552-6933. Available under: doi: 10.1177/0306624X11410150
BibTex
@article{Ross2012-05-01Asses-37579,
  year={2012},
  doi={10.1177/0306624X11410150},
  title={Assessing Reliability, Validity, and Clinical Utility of the BEST-Index in Measuring Living Skills Among Forensic Inpatients},
  number={3},
  volume={56},
  issn={0306-624X},
  journal={International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology},
  pages={385--400},
  author={Ross, Thomas and Reed, Val and Fontao, Maria Isabel and Pfäfflin, Friedemann}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/37579">
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/37579"/>
    <dc:contributor>Reed, Val</dc:contributor>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dc:creator>Fontao, Maria Isabel</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Ross, Thomas</dc:creator>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-02-17T13:47:51Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The assessment of behavioral change as a result of inpatient treatment in forensic psychiatry is an important precondition for violence risk prediction in forensic psychiatry. In relation to a multitude of diagnostically based risk assessment instruments, there is a shortage of appropriate instruments with which to carry out valid and reliable therapeutic assessments that are behaviorally based and therefore appropriate for use within varied psychiatric contexts. There is also a need for instruments which will offer assessors the opportunity to examine possible relationships between criteria of social risk and criteria of more general aspects of social functioning. Tapping the issues pointed out above, the authors present an overview of a normatively based social profiling instrument (the BEST-Index), and discuss evidence for its validity, reliability, and aspects of clinical utility.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dc:creator>Pfäfflin, Friedemann</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Reed, Val</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Pfäfflin, Friedemann</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Fontao, Maria Isabel</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-02-17T13:47:51Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:contributor>Ross, Thomas</dc:contributor>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:issued>2012-05-01</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:title>Assessing Reliability, Validity, and Clinical Utility of the BEST-Index in Measuring Living Skills Among Forensic Inpatients</dcterms:title>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Nein
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen