Response execution, selection, or activation : what is sufficient for response-related repetition effects under task shifting?

dc.contributor.authorHübner, Ronald
dc.contributor.authorDruey, Michel D.
dc.date.accessioned2011-03-25T09:27:51Zdeu
dc.date.available2011-03-25T09:27:51Zdeu
dc.date.issued2005deu
dc.description.abstractRepetition effects are often helpful in revealing information about mental structures and processes. Usually, positive effects have been observed when the stimuli or responses are repeated. However, in task shift studies it has also been found that response repetitions can produce negative effects if the task shifts. Although several mechanisms have been proposed to account for this interaction between task shifting and response repetition, many details remain open. Therefore, a series of four experiments was conducted to answer two questions. First, are motor responses necessary to produce response-related repetition effects, or is response activation sufficient? Second, does the risk of an accidental re-execution of the last response affect the repetition costs? The results show that response activation alone can produce repetition effects. Furthermore, the risk of accidental response re-execution largely modulates these effects.eng
dc.description.versionpublished
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfdeu
dc.identifier.citationFirst publ. in: Psychological Research 70 (2006), 4, pp. 245 261deu
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00426-005-0219-8
dc.identifier.ppn28379903Xdeu
dc.identifier.urihttp://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/11352
dc.language.isoengdeu
dc.legacy.dateIssued2008deu
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/
dc.subject.ddc150deu
dc.titleResponse execution, selection, or activation : what is sufficient for response-related repetition effects under task shifting?eng
dc.typeJOURNAL_ARTICLEdeu
dspace.entity.typePublication
kops.citation.bibtex
@article{Hubner2005Respo-11352,
  year={2005},
  doi={10.1007/s00426-005-0219-8},
  title={Response execution, selection, or activation : what is sufficient for response-related repetition effects under task shifting?},
  number={4},
  volume={70},
  journal={Psychological Research},
  pages={245--261},
  author={Hübner, Ronald and Druey, Michel D.}
}
kops.citation.iso690HÜBNER, Ronald, Michel D. DRUEY, 2005. Response execution, selection, or activation : what is sufficient for response-related repetition effects under task shifting?. In: Psychological Research. 2005, 70(4), pp. 245-261. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s00426-005-0219-8deu
kops.citation.iso690HÜBNER, Ronald, Michel D. DRUEY, 2005. Response execution, selection, or activation : what is sufficient for response-related repetition effects under task shifting?. In: Psychological Research. 2005, 70(4), pp. 245-261. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s00426-005-0219-8eng
kops.citation.rdf
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/11352">
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-25T09:27:51Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Repetition effects are often helpful in revealing information about mental structures and processes. Usually, positive effects have been observed when the stimuli or responses are repeated. However, in task shift studies it has also been found that response repetitions can produce negative effects if the task shifts. Although several mechanisms have been proposed to account for this interaction between task shifting and response repetition, many details remain open. Therefore, a series of four experiments was conducted to answer two questions. First, are motor responses necessary to produce response-related repetition effects, or is response activation sufficient? Second, does the risk of an accidental re-execution of the last response affect the repetition costs? The results show that response activation alone can produce repetition effects. Furthermore, the risk of accidental response re-execution largely modulates these effects.</dcterms:abstract>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/11352"/>
    <dcterms:title>Response execution, selection, or activation : what is sufficient for response-related repetition effects under task shifting?</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>First publ. in: Psychological Research 70 (2006), 4, pp. 245 261</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:contributor>Hübner, Ronald</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:issued>2005</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:creator>Hübner, Ronald</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-25T09:27:51Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/11352/1/Huebner_Druey_06_PsyRes.pdf"/>
    <dc:creator>Druey, Michel D.</dc:creator>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic</dc:rights>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/11352/1/Huebner_Druey_06_PsyRes.pdf"/>
    <dc:contributor>Druey, Michel D.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
kops.description.openAccessopenaccessgreen
kops.flag.knbibliographytrue
kops.identifier.nbnurn:nbn:de:bsz:352-opus-58908deu
kops.opus.id5890deu
kops.sourcefieldPsychological Research. 2005, <b>70</b>(4), pp. 245-261. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s00426-005-0219-8deu
kops.sourcefield.plainPsychological Research. 2005, 70(4), pp. 245-261. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s00426-005-0219-8deu
kops.sourcefield.plainPsychological Research. 2005, 70(4), pp. 245-261. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s00426-005-0219-8eng
relation.isAuthorOfPublication07b579ce-8e8b-440d-8a4c-a6d3e0441783
relation.isAuthorOfPublication5f13c028-1751-44a3-9eb6-40d981b7d7ac
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery07b579ce-8e8b-440d-8a4c-a6d3e0441783
source.bibliographicInfo.fromPage245
source.bibliographicInfo.issue4
source.bibliographicInfo.toPage261
source.bibliographicInfo.volume70
source.periodicalTitlePsychological Research

Dateien

Originalbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
Name:
Huebner_Druey_06_PsyRes.pdf
Größe:
387.17 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Huebner_Druey_06_PsyRes.pdf
Huebner_Druey_06_PsyRes.pdfGröße: 387.17 KBDownloads: 595