Publikation:

Usability of uncertainty visualisation methods : A comparison between different user groups

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Senaratne_251635.pdf
Senaratne_251635.pdfGröße: 112.59 KBDownloads: 218

Datum

2013

Autor:innen

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Beitrag zu einem Konferenzband
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

GeoViz Hamburg 2013 : Workshop on Interactive Maps that Help People Think : Hamburg, March 6 - 8, 2013. 2013

Zusammenfassung

This paper presents the results of a web based survey assessing the usability of main uncertainty visualisation methods for users belonging to different key domains such as GIS and Climate change research. We assess the usability of the visualisation methods based on the user's performance in selected learnability tasks, in addition to assessing user preferences. A correspondence analysis between these two results was further carried out to find the association between the user's performance and preference. The key outcome of our study is the ranking of uncertainty visualisation methods according to their suitability for different user domains, as tested for within our study. The gained results are a valuable basis for tools, such as our Uncertainty Visualisation Selector (described later) which can recommend the most appropriate uncertainty visualisation methods according to user defined requirements.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
004 Informatik

Schlagwörter

Konferenz

GeoViz, 6. März 2013 - 8. März 2013, Hamburg
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690SENARATNE, Hansi, Dominik REUSSER, Tobias SCHRECK, 2013. Usability of uncertainty visualisation methods : A comparison between different user groups. GeoViz. Hamburg, 6. März 2013 - 8. März 2013. In: GeoViz Hamburg 2013 : Workshop on Interactive Maps that Help People Think : Hamburg, March 6 - 8, 2013. 2013
BibTex
@inproceedings{Senaratne2013Usabi-25163,
  year={2013},
  title={Usability of uncertainty visualisation methods : A comparison between different user groups},
  booktitle={GeoViz Hamburg 2013 : Workshop on Interactive Maps that Help People Think : Hamburg, March 6 - 8, 2013},
  author={Senaratne, Hansi and Reusser, Dominik and Schreck, Tobias}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/25163">
    <dc:contributor>Reusser, Dominik</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/25163/1/Senaratne_251635.pdf"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2013-11-20T10:44:20Z</dc:date>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/25163"/>
    <dcterms:title>Usability of uncertainty visualisation methods : A comparison between different user groups</dcterms:title>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/25163/1/Senaratne_251635.pdf"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/36"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2013</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:contributor>Schreck, Tobias</dc:contributor>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:contributor>Senaratne, Hansi</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/36"/>
    <dc:creator>Reusser, Dominik</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>Vortrag gehalten bei : GeoViz Hamburg 2013: Workshop on Interactive Maps that Help People Think : Hamburg, March 6 - 8, 2013</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dc:creator>Senaratne, Hansi</dc:creator>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2013-11-20T10:44:20Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:creator>Schreck, Tobias</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This paper presents the results of a web based survey assessing the usability of main uncertainty visualisation methods for users belonging to different key domains such as GIS and Climate change research. We assess the usability of the visualisation methods based on the user's performance in selected learnability tasks, in addition to assessing user preferences. A correspondence analysis between these two results was further carried out to find the association between the user's performance and preference. The key outcome of our study is the ranking of uncertainty visualisation methods according to their suitability for different user domains, as tested for within our study. The gained results are a valuable basis for tools, such as our Uncertainty Visualisation Selector (described later) which can recommend the most appropriate uncertainty visualisation methods according to user defined requirements.</dcterms:abstract>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen