Publikation: Nominal Argument Structure and the Stage-/Individual-Level Contrast in Hindi-Urdu
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
This paper focuses on a very specific aspect of a construction in Hindi-Urdu involving the verb ho ‘be’. The construction was previously described as displaying a pattern of differential case marking (DCM) in the literature, expressing specific semantic effects. These effectswere previously compared to the contrast known as the stage-/individual-level contrast. The paper will show, however, that this view does not take into account various syntactic and semantic facts about this construction, and argues for a more differentiated view: what has been regarded as a single construction to be differentiated only by the case marking, should rather be treated as two separate constructions with differences in the nominal argument structure, case marking and
semantics.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
SULGER, Sebastian, 2012. Nominal Argument Structure and the Stage-/Individual-Level Contrast in Hindi-Urdu. Seventeenth International Lexical Functional Grammar Conference (LFG12). Denpasar, Bali, 28. Juni 2012 - 1. Juli 2012. In: BUTT, Miriam, ed., Tracy Holloway KING, ed.. Proceedings of the LFG12 Conference. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 2012, pp. 582-602. ISSN 1098-6782BibTex
@inproceedings{Sulger2012Nomin-30057, year={2012}, title={Nominal Argument Structure and the Stage-/Individual-Level Contrast in Hindi-Urdu}, url={http://cslipublications.stanford.edu/LFG/17/papers/lfg12sulger.pdf}, issn={1098-6782}, publisher={CSLI Publications}, address={Stanford}, booktitle={Proceedings of the LFG12 Conference}, pages={582--602}, editor={Butt, Miriam and King, Tracy Holloway}, author={Sulger, Sebastian} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/30057"> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:issued>2012</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:contributor>Sulger, Sebastian</dc:contributor> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/30057"/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-02-25T12:00:03Z</dc:date> <dc:creator>Sulger, Sebastian</dc:creator> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/> <dcterms:title>Nominal Argument Structure and the Stage-/Individual-Level Contrast in Hindi-Urdu</dcterms:title> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This paper focuses on a very specific aspect of a construction in Hindi-Urdu involving the verb ho ‘be’. The construction was previously described as displaying a pattern of differential case marking (DCM) in the literature, expressing specific semantic effects. These effectswere previously compared to the contrast known as the stage-/individual-level contrast. The paper will show, however, that this view does not take into account various syntactic and semantic facts about this construction, and argues for a more differentiated view: what has been regarded as a single construction to be differentiated only by the case marking, should rather be treated as two separate constructions with differences in the nominal argument structure, case marking and<br />semantics.</dcterms:abstract> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-02-25T12:00:03Z</dcterms:available> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>