Committing to implementation intentions : Attention and memory effects for selected situational cues

Achtziger, Anja; Bayer, Ute C.; Gollwitzer, Peter M.

Committing to implementation intentions : Attention and memory effects for selected situational cues

Dateien

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

Datum

2011

Publikationstyp

Zeitschriftenartikel

Publikationsstatus

Published

Erschienen in

Motivation and Emotion. 2011, 36(3), pp. 287-300. ISSN 0146-7239. eISSN 1573-6644. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s11031-011-9261-6

Zusammenfassung

Two studies tested whether forming implementation intentions (Gollwitzer, Am Psychol 54:493–503 in 1999) results in a heightened activation of specified situational cues. Going beyond prior studies, participants of the present studies specified these opportunities on their own (i.e., the action cues were not assigned by the experimenter), and activation level was assessed by attraction of attention and recall performance rather than lexical decisions. In Study 1, situational cues associated with the where and when to act on an everyday life goal attracted more attention than non-specified cues when presented to the non-attended channel in a dichotic listening task. In Study 2, the recall of specified cues was better than that of non-specified cues both 15 min after forming implementation intentions and after a delay of 2 days. Importantly, goal commitment and implementation intention commitment moderated this effect.

Fachgebiet (DDC)

150 Psychologie

Schlagwörter

Intentions, Goals, Implementation intentions, Cognitive accessibility, Commitment

Zitieren

ISO 690

ACHTZIGER, Anja, Ute C. BAYER, Peter M. GOLLWITZER, 2011. Committing to implementation intentions : Attention and memory effects for selected situational cues. In: Motivation and Emotion. 2011, 36(3), pp. 287-300. ISSN 0146-7239. eISSN 1573-6644. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s11031-011-9261-6

BibTex

@article{Achtziger2011Commi-21912,
  year={2011},
  doi={10.1007/s11031-011-9261-6},
  title={Committing to implementation intentions : Attention and memory effects for selected situational cues},
  number={3},
  volume={36},
  issn={0146-7239},
  journal={Motivation and Emotion},
  pages={287--300},
  author={Achtziger, Anja and Bayer, Ute C. and Gollwitzer, Peter M.}
}

RDF

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/21912">
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2013-02-20T08:13:04Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>Motivation and Emotion ; 36 (2012), 3. - S. 287-300</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
    <dc:creator>Bayer, Ute C.</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Gollwitzer, Peter M.</dc:contributor>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dc:creator>Gollwitzer, Peter M.</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Two studies tested whether forming implementation intentions (Gollwitzer, Am Psychol 54:493–503 in 1999) results in a heightened activation of specified situational cues. Going beyond prior studies, participants of the present studies specified these opportunities on their own (i.e., the action cues were not assigned by the experimenter), and activation level was assessed by attraction of attention and recall performance rather than lexical decisions. In Study 1, situational cues associated with the where and when to act on an everyday life goal attracted more attention than non-specified cues when presented to the non-attended channel in a dichotic listening task. In Study 2, the recall of specified cues was better than that of non-specified cues both 15 min after forming implementation intentions and after a delay of 2 days. Importantly, goal commitment and implementation intention commitment moderated this effect.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dc:creator>Achtziger, Anja</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Achtziger, Anja</dc:contributor>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/21912"/>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dc:contributor>Bayer, Ute C.</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:issued>2011</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2013-02-20T08:13:04Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:title>Committing to implementation intentions : Attention and memory effects for selected situational cues</dcterms:title>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Universitätsbibliographie

Ja