Publikation: Nominalism and Mathematical Objectivity
Lade...
Dateien
Datum
2022
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Hybrid
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
Axiomathes. Springer. 2022, 32, S. 833-851. ISSN 1122-1151. eISSN 1572-8390. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1007/s10516-022-09637-z
Zusammenfassung
We observe that Putnam’s model-theoretic argument against determinacy of the concept of second-order quantification or that of the set is harmless to the nominalist. It serves as a good motivation for the nominalist philosophy of mathematics. But in the end it can lead to a serious challenge to the nominalist account of mathematical objectivity if some minimal assumptions about the relation between mathematical objectivity and logical objectivity are made. We consider three strategies the nominalist might take to meet this challenge, and we argue that all these strategies are untenable.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
100 Philosophie
Schlagwörter
Finitude, Second-order logic, Mathematical determinacy, Mathematical objectivity, Nominalism, Logical objectivity
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690
LUO, Guanglong, 2022. Nominalism and Mathematical Objectivity. In: Axiomathes. Springer. 2022, 32, S. 833-851. ISSN 1122-1151. eISSN 1572-8390. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1007/s10516-022-09637-zBibTex
@article{Luo2022-10Nomin-59127, year={2022}, doi={10.1007/s10516-022-09637-z}, title={Nominalism and Mathematical Objectivity}, volume={32}, issn={1122-1151}, journal={Axiomathes}, pages={833--851}, author={Luo, Guanglong} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/59127"> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/59127/1/Luo_2-1fhyc26unkn696.pdf"/> <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <dcterms:title>Nominalism and Mathematical Objectivity</dcterms:title> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-11-11T14:46:17Z</dcterms:available> <dcterms:issued>2022-10</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">We observe that Putnam’s model-theoretic argument against determinacy of the concept of second-order quantification or that of the set is harmless to the nominalist. It serves as a good motivation for the nominalist philosophy of mathematics. But in the end it can lead to a serious challenge to the nominalist account of mathematical objectivity if some minimal assumptions about the relation between mathematical objectivity and logical objectivity are made. We consider three strategies the nominalist might take to meet this challenge, and we argue that all these strategies are untenable.</dcterms:abstract> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/59127"/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-11-11T14:46:17Z</dc:date> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:contributor>Luo, Guanglong</dc:contributor> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/59127/1/Luo_2-1fhyc26unkn696.pdf"/> <dc:creator>Luo, Guanglong</dc:creator> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>
Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Nein
Begutachtet
Ja