Publikation:

Classical Negation and Expansions of Belnap–Dunn Logic

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

De_0-290199.pdf
De_0-290199.pdfGröße: 225.05 KBDownloads: 563

Datum

2015

Autor:innen

Omori, Hitoshi

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

European Union (EU): 263227

Projekt

Indeterminism Ltd. An intervention on the free will debate
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Studia Logica. 2015, 103(4), pp. 825-851. ISSN 0039-3215. eISSN 1572-8730. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s11225-014-9595-7

Zusammenfassung

It is known that classical negation can be recovered in some systems of non-classical logics, such as paraconsistent logic and many-valued logic. However, the notion of classical negation needs to be examined carefully. Indeed, it is often thought that classical negation can be defined uniquely. This kind of arguments usually relies on a proof-theoretic viewpoint. But, in fact, from a semantic viewpoint, the definition of classical negation is not so straightforward as we might expect. We provide such an example by considering some expansions of FDE, and present some results which give us a new insight on the notion of classical negation in systems of non-classical logic.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
100 Philosophie

Schlagwörter

FDE(Belnap-Dunn Logic), classical negation, material implication, three-valued logic

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690DE, Michael, Hitoshi OMORI, 2015. Classical Negation and Expansions of Belnap–Dunn Logic. In: Studia Logica. 2015, 103(4), pp. 825-851. ISSN 0039-3215. eISSN 1572-8730. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s11225-014-9595-7
BibTex
@article{De2015Class-31002,
  year={2015},
  doi={10.1007/s11225-014-9595-7},
  title={Classical Negation and Expansions of Belnap–Dunn Logic},
  number={4},
  volume={103},
  issn={0039-3215},
  journal={Studia Logica},
  pages={825--851},
  author={De, Michael and Omori, Hitoshi}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/31002">
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/31002/3/De_0-290199.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-05-21T08:19:06Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:creator>Omori, Hitoshi</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:title>Classical Negation and Expansions of Belnap–Dunn Logic</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/31002"/>
    <dc:contributor>Omori, Hitoshi</dc:contributor>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dc:contributor>De, Michael</dc:contributor>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">It is known that classical negation can be recovered in some systems of non-classical logics, such as paraconsistent logic and many-valued logic. However, the notion of classical negation needs to be examined carefully. Indeed, it is often thought that classical negation can be defined uniquely. This kind of arguments usually relies on a proof-theoretic viewpoint. But, in fact, from a semantic viewpoint, the definition of classical negation is not so straightforward as we might expect. We provide such an example by considering some expansions of FDE, and present some results which give us a new insight on the notion of classical negation in systems of non-classical logic.</dcterms:abstract>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:creator>De, Michael</dc:creator>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-05-21T08:19:06Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:issued>2015</dcterms:issued>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/31002/3/De_0-290199.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen