Publikation: Making Civil Society Work : Models of Democracy and Their Impact on Civic Engagement
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
This article evaluates the influence of different models of democracy on individual volunteering in associations and organizations. More precisely, we investigate the extent to which the degree of liberal and participatory conceptions of democracy respectively shapes the conditions under which voluntary engagement thrives. We apply multilevel analysis—a method that corresponds well to the central hypothesis of institutional approaches and is most suitable for modeling the relationship between the democratic context and individual volunteering. We show that both a representative conception of democracy, as well as strong direct democracy, leads to advantageous conditions for civic engagement. In contrast, if the two models of democracy are combined, the two different logics of the democratic process disturb one another, resulting in less voluntary engagement.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
STADELMANN-STEFFEN, Isabelle, Markus FREITAG, 2011. Making Civil Society Work : Models of Democracy and Their Impact on Civic Engagement. In: Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. Sage. 2011, 40(3), pp. 526-551. ISSN 0899-7640. eISSN 1552-7395. Available under: doi: 10.1177/0899764010362114BibTex
@article{StadelmannSteffen2011-06Makin-51387, year={2011}, doi={10.1177/0899764010362114}, title={Making Civil Society Work : Models of Democracy and Their Impact on Civic Engagement}, number={3}, volume={40}, issn={0899-7640}, journal={Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly}, pages={526--551}, author={Stadelmann-Steffen, Isabelle and Freitag, Markus} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/51387"> <dcterms:issued>2011-06</dcterms:issued> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-10-15T13:09:30Z</dcterms:available> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dc:creator>Freitag, Markus</dc:creator> <dcterms:title>Making Civil Society Work : Models of Democracy and Their Impact on Civic Engagement</dcterms:title> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/> <dc:contributor>Stadelmann-Steffen, Isabelle</dc:contributor> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/51387"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This article evaluates the influence of different models of democracy on individual volunteering in associations and organizations. More precisely, we investigate the extent to which the degree of liberal and participatory conceptions of democracy respectively shapes the conditions under which voluntary engagement thrives. We apply multilevel analysis—a method that corresponds well to the central hypothesis of institutional approaches and is most suitable for modeling the relationship between the democratic context and individual volunteering. We show that both a representative conception of democracy, as well as strong direct democracy, leads to advantageous conditions for civic engagement. In contrast, if the two models of democracy are combined, the two different logics of the democratic process disturb one another, resulting in less voluntary engagement.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-10-15T13:09:30Z</dc:date> <dc:creator>Stadelmann-Steffen, Isabelle</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Freitag, Markus</dc:contributor> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>