Publikation: A Source Like Any Other? : Field and Survey Experiment Evidence on How Interest Groups Shape Public Opinion
Lade...
Dateien
Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.
Datum
2021
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
Journal of Communication. Oxford University Press (OUP). 2021, 71(2), pp. 276-304. ISSN 0021-9916. eISSN 1460-2466. Available under: doi: 10.1093/joc/jqab005
Zusammenfassung
Interest groups increasingly communicate with the public, yet we know little abouthow effective they are in shaping opinions. Since interest groups differ from otherpublic communicators, we propose a theory of interest group persuasion. Interestgroups typically have a low public profile, and so most people are unlikely to havestrong attitudes regarding them. Source-related predispositions, such as credibilityassessments, are therefore less relevant in moderating effects of persuasive appeals byinterest groups than those of high-profile communicators. We test this argument inmultiple large-scale studies. A parallel survey and field experiment (N¼4,659) estab-lishes the persuasive potential of low-profile interest groups in both controlled and re-alistic settings. An observational study (N¼700) shows that substantial portions ofthe public are unable to assess interest group credibility. A survey experiment(N¼8,245) demonstrates that credibility assessments moderate the impact of partybut not interest group communication.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
320 Politik
Schlagwörter
Persuasion, Interest Groups, Political Communication, Source Credibility, FieldExperiments, Survey Experiments
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690
JUNGHERR, Andreas, Alexander WUTTKE, Matthias MADER, Harald SCHOEN, 2021. A Source Like Any Other? : Field and Survey Experiment Evidence on How Interest Groups Shape Public Opinion. In: Journal of Communication. Oxford University Press (OUP). 2021, 71(2), pp. 276-304. ISSN 0021-9916. eISSN 1460-2466. Available under: doi: 10.1093/joc/jqab005BibTex
@article{Jungherr2021-04-25Sourc-54024,
year={2021},
doi={10.1093/joc/jqab005},
title={A Source Like Any Other? : Field and Survey Experiment Evidence on How Interest Groups Shape Public Opinion},
number={2},
volume={71},
issn={0021-9916},
journal={Journal of Communication},
pages={276--304},
author={Jungherr, Andreas and Wuttke, Alexander and Mader, Matthias and Schoen, Harald}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/54024">
<dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
<dc:contributor>Jungherr, Andreas</dc:contributor>
<dc:creator>Jungherr, Andreas</dc:creator>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
<dcterms:title>A Source Like Any Other? : Field and Survey Experiment Evidence on How Interest Groups Shape Public Opinion</dcterms:title>
<dc:contributor>Wuttke, Alexander</dc:contributor>
<dc:creator>Mader, Matthias</dc:creator>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-06-18T09:25:35Z</dcterms:available>
<dc:creator>Wuttke, Alexander</dc:creator>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<dcterms:issued>2021-04-25</dcterms:issued>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/54024"/>
<dc:contributor>Mader, Matthias</dc:contributor>
<dc:creator>Schoen, Harald</dc:creator>
<dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-06-18T09:25:35Z</dc:date>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
<dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Interest groups increasingly communicate with the public, yet we know little abouthow effective they are in shaping opinions. Since interest groups differ from otherpublic communicators, we propose a theory of interest group persuasion. Interestgroups typically have a low public profile, and so most people are unlikely to havestrong attitudes regarding them. Source-related predispositions, such as credibilityassessments, are therefore less relevant in moderating effects of persuasive appeals byinterest groups than those of high-profile communicators. We test this argument inmultiple large-scale studies. A parallel survey and field experiment (N¼4,659) estab-lishes the persuasive potential of low-profile interest groups in both controlled and re-alistic settings. An observational study (N¼700) shows that substantial portions ofthe public are unable to assess interest group credibility. A survey experiment(N¼8,245) demonstrates that credibility assessments moderate the impact of partybut not interest group communication.</dcterms:abstract>
<dc:contributor>Schoen, Harald</dc:contributor>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Ja
