@article{Jungherr2021-04-25Sourc-54024,
  year={2021},
  doi={10.1093/joc/jqab005},
  title={A Source Like Any Other? : Field and Survey Experiment Evidence on How Interest Groups Shape Public Opinion},
  number={2},
  volume={71},
  issn={0021-9916},
  journal={Journal of Communication},
  pages={276--304},
  author={Jungherr, Andreas and Wuttke, Alexander and Mader, Matthias and Schoen, Harald}
}

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/54024">
    <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
    <dc:contributor>Jungherr, Andreas</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Jungherr, Andreas</dc:creator>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dcterms:title>A Source Like Any Other? : Field and Survey Experiment Evidence on How Interest Groups Shape Public Opinion</dcterms:title>
    <dc:contributor>Wuttke, Alexander</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Mader, Matthias</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-06-18T09:25:35Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:creator>Wuttke, Alexander</dc:creator>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2021-04-25</dcterms:issued>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/54024"/>
    <dc:contributor>Mader, Matthias</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Schoen, Harald</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-06-18T09:25:35Z</dc:date>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Interest groups increasingly communicate with the public, yet we know little abouthow effective they are in shaping opinions. Since interest groups differ from otherpublic communicators, we propose a theory of interest group persuasion. Interestgroups typically have a low public profile, and so most people are unlikely to havestrong attitudes regarding them. Source-related predispositions, such as credibilityassessments, are therefore less relevant in moderating effects of persuasive appeals byinterest groups than those of high-profile communicators. We test this argument inmultiple large-scale studies. A parallel survey and field experiment (N¼4,659) estab-lishes the persuasive potential of low-profile interest groups in both controlled and re-alistic settings. An observational study (N¼700) shows that substantial portions ofthe public are unable to assess interest group credibility. A survey experiment(N¼8,245) demonstrates that credibility assessments moderate the impact of partybut not interest group communication.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:contributor>Schoen, Harald</dc:contributor>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>