Publikation:

A Source Like Any Other? : Field and Survey Experiment Evidence on How Interest Groups Shape Public Opinion

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

Datum

2021

Autor:innen

Wuttke, Alexander
Schoen, Harald

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Journal of Communication. Oxford University Press (OUP). 2021, 71(2), pp. 276-304. ISSN 0021-9916. eISSN 1460-2466. Available under: doi: 10.1093/joc/jqab005

Zusammenfassung

Interest groups increasingly communicate with the public, yet we know little abouthow effective they are in shaping opinions. Since interest groups differ from otherpublic communicators, we propose a theory of interest group persuasion. Interestgroups typically have a low public profile, and so most people are unlikely to havestrong attitudes regarding them. Source-related predispositions, such as credibilityassessments, are therefore less relevant in moderating effects of persuasive appeals byinterest groups than those of high-profile communicators. We test this argument inmultiple large-scale studies. A parallel survey and field experiment (N¼4,659) estab-lishes the persuasive potential of low-profile interest groups in both controlled and re-alistic settings. An observational study (N¼700) shows that substantial portions ofthe public are unable to assess interest group credibility. A survey experiment(N¼8,245) demonstrates that credibility assessments moderate the impact of partybut not interest group communication.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
320 Politik

Schlagwörter

Persuasion, Interest Groups, Political Communication, Source Credibility, FieldExperiments, Survey Experiments

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690JUNGHERR, Andreas, Alexander WUTTKE, Matthias MADER, Harald SCHOEN, 2021. A Source Like Any Other? : Field and Survey Experiment Evidence on How Interest Groups Shape Public Opinion. In: Journal of Communication. Oxford University Press (OUP). 2021, 71(2), pp. 276-304. ISSN 0021-9916. eISSN 1460-2466. Available under: doi: 10.1093/joc/jqab005
BibTex
@article{Jungherr2021-04-25Sourc-54024,
  year={2021},
  doi={10.1093/joc/jqab005},
  title={A Source Like Any Other? : Field and Survey Experiment Evidence on How Interest Groups Shape Public Opinion},
  number={2},
  volume={71},
  issn={0021-9916},
  journal={Journal of Communication},
  pages={276--304},
  author={Jungherr, Andreas and Wuttke, Alexander and Mader, Matthias and Schoen, Harald}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/54024">
    <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
    <dc:contributor>Jungherr, Andreas</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Jungherr, Andreas</dc:creator>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dcterms:title>A Source Like Any Other? : Field and Survey Experiment Evidence on How Interest Groups Shape Public Opinion</dcterms:title>
    <dc:contributor>Wuttke, Alexander</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Mader, Matthias</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-06-18T09:25:35Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:creator>Wuttke, Alexander</dc:creator>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2021-04-25</dcterms:issued>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/54024"/>
    <dc:contributor>Mader, Matthias</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Schoen, Harald</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-06-18T09:25:35Z</dc:date>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Interest groups increasingly communicate with the public, yet we know little abouthow effective they are in shaping opinions. Since interest groups differ from otherpublic communicators, we propose a theory of interest group persuasion. Interestgroups typically have a low public profile, and so most people are unlikely to havestrong attitudes regarding them. Source-related predispositions, such as credibilityassessments, are therefore less relevant in moderating effects of persuasive appeals byinterest groups than those of high-profile communicators. We test this argument inmultiple large-scale studies. A parallel survey and field experiment (N¼4,659) estab-lishes the persuasive potential of low-profile interest groups in both controlled and re-alistic settings. An observational study (N¼700) shows that substantial portions ofthe public are unable to assess interest group credibility. A survey experiment(N¼8,245) demonstrates that credibility assessments moderate the impact of partybut not interest group communication.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:contributor>Schoen, Harald</dc:contributor>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Ja
Diese Publikation teilen