Publikation:

The Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for violence risk (SAPROF) : A meta-analysis of its predictive and incremental validity

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

Datum

2023

Autor:innen

de Ruiter, Corine
Hynes, Sophia E.
Krishnan, Nishant
Levtova, Yara
Uyar, Abdo

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Psychological Assessment. American Psychological Association (APA). 2023, 35(1), pp. 56-67. ISSN 1040-3590. eISSN 1939-134X. Available under: doi: 10.1037/pas0001184

Zusammenfassung

Although the inclusion of protective factors in risk assessment is believed to improve prediction, most risk assessment tools emphasize risk factors. In response, the Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for violence risk (SAPROF) has been developed, which focuses exclusively on protective factors and is used in conjunction with a structured risk assessment tool. It has received increasing attention from both researchers and forensic mental health practitioners, and additional versions have been developed for use with adolescents (SAPROF-YV) and sex offenders (SAPROF-SO). To assess their psychometric performance, we conducted a meta-analysis of validation studies. Our final sample included 39 articles with 5,434 subjects from 16 countries. Overall, the SAPROF(-YV/-SO) showed good interrater reliability and moderate-to-good predictive performance for the absence of recidivism and institutional misconduct. All three instruments exhibited incremental validity when used in conjunction with a risk-focused assessment tool. Our meta-analysis additionally showed that changes on the SAPROF are associated with decreased violent and general recidivism after controlling for baseline risk. We also uncovered several shortcomings in current research with the SAPROF(-YV/-SO). Studies did not report calibration indices and most studies were retrospective and limited to male offenders. The present findings provide support for the relevance of protective factors in risk assessment, but future research should focus on their hypothesized role in treatment and risk management.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
150 Psychologie

Schlagwörter

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690BURGHART, Matthias, Corine DE RUITER, Sophia E. HYNES, Nishant KRISHNAN, Yara LEVTOVA, Abdo UYAR, 2023. The Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for violence risk (SAPROF) : A meta-analysis of its predictive and incremental validity. In: Psychological Assessment. American Psychological Association (APA). 2023, 35(1), pp. 56-67. ISSN 1040-3590. eISSN 1939-134X. Available under: doi: 10.1037/pas0001184
BibTex
@article{Burghart2023Struc-59007,
  year={2023},
  doi={10.1037/pas0001184},
  title={The Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for violence risk (SAPROF) : A meta-analysis of its predictive and incremental validity},
  number={1},
  volume={35},
  issn={1040-3590},
  journal={Psychological Assessment},
  pages={56--67},
  author={Burghart, Matthias and de Ruiter, Corine and Hynes, Sophia E. and Krishnan, Nishant and Levtova, Yara and Uyar, Abdo}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/59007">
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dc:creator>Uyar, Abdo</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Levtova, Yara</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Burghart, Matthias</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Hynes, Sophia E.</dc:creator>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2023</dcterms:issued>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:contributor>de Ruiter, Corine</dc:contributor>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-11-03T10:31:51Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Although the inclusion of protective factors in risk assessment is believed to improve prediction, most risk assessment tools emphasize risk factors. In response, the Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for violence risk (SAPROF) has been developed, which focuses exclusively on protective factors and is used in conjunction with a structured risk assessment tool. It has received increasing attention from both researchers and forensic mental health practitioners, and additional versions have been developed for use with adolescents (SAPROF-YV) and sex offenders (SAPROF-SO). To assess their psychometric performance, we conducted a meta-analysis of validation studies. Our final sample included 39 articles with 5,434 subjects from 16 countries. Overall, the SAPROF(-YV/-SO) showed good interrater reliability and moderate-to-good predictive performance for the absence of recidivism and institutional misconduct. All three instruments exhibited incremental validity when used in conjunction with a risk-focused assessment tool. Our meta-analysis additionally showed that changes on the SAPROF are associated with decreased violent and general recidivism after controlling for baseline risk. We also uncovered several shortcomings in current research with the SAPROF(-YV/-SO). Studies did not report calibration indices and most studies were retrospective and limited to male offenders. The present findings provide support for the relevance of protective factors in risk assessment, but future research should focus on their hypothesized role in treatment and risk management.</dcterms:abstract>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/59007"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:contributor>Hynes, Sophia E.</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-11-03T10:31:51Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:creator>Krishnan, Nishant</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Levtova, Yara</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>de Ruiter, Corine</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Krishnan, Nishant</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Uyar, Abdo</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Burghart, Matthias</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:title>The Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for violence risk (SAPROF) : A meta-analysis of its predictive and incremental validity</dcterms:title>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Ja
Diese Publikation teilen