Publikation: On the status of 'Maximize Presupposition'
Lade...
Dateien
Datum
2016
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Beitrag zu einem Konferenzband
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
MORONEY, Mary, ed., Carol-Rose LITTLE, ed., Jacob COLLARD, ed., Dan BURGDORF, ed.. Proceedings of the 26th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference (SALT 26). Washington, DC: Linguistic Society of America, 2016, pp. 980-1001. Proceedings of SALT. 26. ISSN 2163-5951. Available under: doi: 10.3765/salt.v26i0.3947
Zusammenfassung
Heim (1991) postulated the principle MAXIMIZE PRESUPPOSITION (MP), which has proven useful in the explanation of a range of phenomena. But what kind of principle is MP? Is it a normative constraint on language use, akin to a rule in a game? Or is it similar to Grice’s MAXIMS OF CONVERSATION, which capture defeasible tendencies in behavior motivated by general considerations about cooperative communication? I argue that either construal faces significant challenges, and provide an alternative conception of MP as a ‘linguistic preference’- a (selfish) preference between linguistic forms that speakers happen to have. In this view, MP is neither a normative rule nor a Gricean maxim, but it functions like, and interacts with, such maxims in pragmatic reasoning.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
400 Sprachwissenschaft, Linguistik
Schlagwörter
Maximize Presupposition, antipresupposition, felicity, implicature
Konferenz
SALT 26 : 26th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference, 12. Mai 2016 - 15. Dez. 2016, Austin, TX
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690
LAUER, Sven, 2016. On the status of 'Maximize Presupposition'. SALT 26 : 26th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference. Austin, TX, 12. Mai 2016 - 15. Dez. 2016. In: MORONEY, Mary, ed., Carol-Rose LITTLE, ed., Jacob COLLARD, ed., Dan BURGDORF, ed.. Proceedings of the 26th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference (SALT 26). Washington, DC: Linguistic Society of America, 2016, pp. 980-1001. Proceedings of SALT. 26. ISSN 2163-5951. Available under: doi: 10.3765/salt.v26i0.3947BibTex
@inproceedings{Lauer2016statu-36752,
year={2016},
doi={10.3765/salt.v26i0.3947},
title={On the status of 'Maximize Presupposition'},
number={26},
issn={2163-5951},
publisher={Linguistic Society of America},
address={Washington, DC},
series={Proceedings of SALT},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 26th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference (SALT 26)},
pages={980--1001},
editor={Moroney, Mary and Little, Carol-Rose and Collard, Jacob and Burgdorf, Dan},
author={Lauer, Sven}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/36752">
<dc:creator>Lauer, Sven</dc:creator>
<dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/36752/3/Lauer_0-378787.pdf"/>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-01-17T14:11:26Z</dcterms:available>
<dc:contributor>Lauer, Sven</dc:contributor>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Heim (1991) postulated the principle MAXIMIZE PRESUPPOSITION (MP), which has proven useful in the explanation of a range of phenomena. But what kind of principle is MP? Is it a normative constraint on language use, akin to a rule in a game? Or is it similar to Grice’s MAXIMS OF CONVERSATION, which capture defeasible tendencies in behavior motivated by general considerations about cooperative communication? I argue that either construal faces significant challenges, and provide an alternative conception of MP as a ‘linguistic preference’- a (selfish) preference between linguistic forms that speakers happen to have. In this view, MP is neither a normative rule nor a Gricean maxim, but it functions like, and interacts with, such maxims in pragmatic reasoning.</dcterms:abstract>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-01-17T14:11:26Z</dc:date>
<dcterms:issued>2016</dcterms:issued>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dcterms:title>On the status of 'Maximize Presupposition'</dcterms:title>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/36752/3/Lauer_0-378787.pdf"/>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/>
<dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/52"/>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/52"/>
<dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/36752"/>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
