Publikation:

Protest and Repression Dynamics in Disastrous Times

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Jansesberger-2-1c2yktetsutw40.pdf
Jansesberger-2-1c2yktetsutw40.pdfGröße: 8.82 MBDownloads: 166

Datum

2023

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Dissertation
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Zusammenfassung

The increasing frequency and intensity of climate change-related extreme weather events in various global regions pose significant challenges to the affected societies. This is particularly true for less resilient and vulnerable populations, for whom extreme weather conditions often result in catastrophe. Numerous recent examples illustrate that the challenging periods following sudden weather disasters, such as storms, floods, and landslides, often lead to disruptive political incidents, including citizen protests against government actions or, conversely, state repression against citizens. However, this is only the case under specific conditions. This dissertation aims to enhance our understanding of the contextual factors that make protests and repression more likely to occur after disastrous weather events and to explain this relationship. The central argument of this work posits that the magnitude of grievances following sudden weather disasters is not the sole determinant of protests occurring. Profound grievances do not necessarily translate into protests unless the opportunity to effectively mobilize emerges. The degree to which mobilization is viable depends on various factors, such as the political system, characteristics of different societal groups and geographical regions, and major political developments and events. Research paper 1, conducted in collaboration with Gabriele Spilker, explores why and how autocratic systems often exert increased repression following weather disasters, which limits political mobilization opportunities for protests. Governments feeling threatened by the chaos and societal discontent often following destructive weather events may resort to repression to prevent unrest before it materializes or may clamp down on unrest after it has already emerged. The paper employs a quantitative analysis of monthly data on the use of repression measures in autocracies in Africa and Latin America from 1990 to 2017. The findings indicate an increase in government-initiated repressive actions in sub-national regions in the months following weather disasters, which were primarily aimed at preventing unrest rather than suppressing existing disturbances. Research paper 2 investigates the sub-national regions of autocracies in which anti-government protests are likely to occur after weather disasters despite government repression. It argues that regions inhabited by marginalized ethnic groups may be more likely to hold protests. These groups often bear the brunt of catastrophic weather events due to government neglect but also have advantages in terms of their mobilization potential. The cohesion and trust within these groups, driven by shared histories and frequent interaction, are often stronger. Furthermore, the existing structures that these groups have relied upon often facilitate collective action. This hypothesis was tested and empirically supported by quantitative analyses of monthly protest data in 48 autocracies from 2003 to 2019: anti-government protests in the months following catastrophic storms, floods, or landslides were significantly more likely to occur in sub-national regions where marginalized ethnic groups lived than they were to occur in regions where no marginalized groups resided. Research paper 3 shifts the focus from autocracies—contexts where successful protest mobilization is made more difficult by the increased risk of political repression—to urban areas in the world's largest democracy, India. Metropolises in India, a state in the Global South, are both geographically and politically places where protest mobilization would be expected to occur more frequently should dissatisfaction arise. However, cities in the Global South are often highly exposed to the negative consequences of sudden weather catastrophes but do not always experience protests. Research paper 3 argues that temporary variations in mobilization opportunities play a crucial role in determining whether protests occur after destructive weather events. Research paper 3 examines the hypothesis that sudden weather catastrophes are more likely to lead to anti-government protests in the months preceding elections. Opposition politicians have a strong incentive to highlight inadequate governmental disaster management during this period and organize protests against it to position themselves as the better political alternative, thereby enhancing their chances in an upcoming election. Furthermore, citizens may be more willing to participate in protests shortly before elections to draw attention to the issues triggered by the weather catastrophe. Politicians concerned about election results would pay more attention to the wishes and complaints of their voters and adjust their behavior accordingly. This paper draws on a unique self-compiled dataset of protest events in 19 Indian metropolises that occurred between 2000 and 2019. The quantitative analyses of monthly protest dynamics in these cities support the theoretical argument. The likelihood of protests after sudden weather catastrophes is particularly high before state-level elections. As states in India share the bulk of responsibility for disaster management, this finding is plausible and consistent with the theoretical argument. In summary, this dissertation demonstrates that weather catastrophes not only play a role in armed conflicts, a major focus of previous research, but also, under specific circumstances, increase the likelihood of repression and protests. The findings indicate that in autocracies, weather disasters can induce governments to initiate repression, significantly impeding protest mobilization. Additionally, this dissertation contributes valuable insights into the importance of considering variation in mobilization structures to understand when and where sudden weather events trigger anti-government protests.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
320 Politik

Schlagwörter

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690JANSESBERGER, Viktoria, 2023. Protest and Repression Dynamics in Disastrous Times [Dissertation]. Konstanz: Universität Konstanz
BibTex
@phdthesis{Jansesberger2023Prote-69777,
  year={2023},
  title={Protest and Repression Dynamics in Disastrous Times},
  author={Jansesberger, Viktoria},
  address={Konstanz},
  school={Universität Konstanz}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/69777">
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:abstract>The increasing frequency and intensity of climate change-related extreme weather events in various global regions pose significant challenges to the affected societies. This is particularly true for less resilient and vulnerable populations, for whom extreme weather conditions often result in catastrophe. Numerous recent examples illustrate that the challenging periods following sudden weather disasters, such as storms, floods, and landslides, often lead to disruptive political incidents, including citizen protests against government actions or, conversely, state repression against citizens. However, this is only the case under specific conditions. This dissertation aims to enhance our understanding of the contextual factors that make protests and repression more likely to occur after disastrous weather events and to explain this relationship. 
The central argument of this work posits that the magnitude of grievances following sudden weather disasters is not the sole determinant of protests occurring. Profound grievances do not necessarily translate into protests unless the opportunity to effectively mobilize emerges. The degree to which mobilization is viable depends on various factors, such as the political system, characteristics of different societal groups and geographical regions, and major political developments and events.
Research paper 1, conducted in collaboration with Gabriele Spilker, explores why and how autocratic systems often exert increased repression following weather disasters, which limits political mobilization opportunities for protests. Governments feeling threatened by the chaos and societal discontent often following destructive weather events may resort to repression to prevent unrest before it materializes or may clamp down on unrest after it has already emerged. The paper employs a quantitative analysis of monthly data on the use of repression measures in autocracies in Africa and Latin America from 1990 to 2017. The findings indicate an increase in government-initiated repressive actions in sub-national regions in the months following weather disasters, which were primarily aimed at preventing unrest rather than suppressing existing disturbances.
Research paper 2 investigates the sub-national regions of autocracies in which anti-government protests are likely to occur after weather disasters despite government repression. It argues that regions inhabited by marginalized ethnic groups may be more likely to hold protests. These groups often bear the brunt of catastrophic weather events due to government neglect but also have advantages in terms of their mobilization potential. The cohesion and trust within these groups, driven by shared histories and frequent interaction, are often stronger. Furthermore, the existing structures that these groups have relied upon often facilitate collective action. This hypothesis was tested and empirically supported by quantitative analyses of monthly protest data in 48 autocracies from 2003 to 2019: anti-government protests in the months following catastrophic storms, floods, or landslides were significantly more likely to occur in sub-national regions where marginalized ethnic groups lived than they were to occur in regions where no marginalized groups resided.
Research paper 3 shifts the focus from autocracies—contexts where successful protest mobilization is made more difficult by the increased risk of political repression—to urban areas in the world's largest democracy, India. Metropolises in India, a state in the Global South, are both geographically and politically places where protest mobilization would be expected to occur more frequently should dissatisfaction arise. However, cities in the Global South are often highly exposed to the negative consequences of sudden weather catastrophes but do not always experience protests. Research paper 3 argues that temporary variations in mobilization opportunities play a crucial role in determining whether protests occur after destructive weather events. 
Research paper 3 examines the hypothesis that sudden weather catastrophes are more likely to lead to anti-government protests in the months preceding elections. Opposition politicians have a strong incentive to highlight inadequate governmental disaster management during this period and organize protests against it to position themselves as the better political alternative, thereby enhancing their chances in an upcoming election. Furthermore, citizens may be more willing to participate in protests shortly before elections to draw attention to the issues triggered by the weather catastrophe. Politicians concerned about election results would pay more attention to the wishes and complaints of their voters and adjust their behavior accordingly. This paper draws on a unique self-compiled dataset of protest events in 19 Indian metropolises that occurred between 2000 and 2019. The quantitative analyses of monthly protest dynamics in these cities support the theoretical argument. The likelihood of protests after sudden weather catastrophes is particularly high before state-level elections. As states in India share the bulk of responsibility for disaster management, this finding is plausible and consistent with the theoretical argument.
In summary, this dissertation demonstrates that weather catastrophes not only play a role in armed conflicts, a major focus of previous research, but also, under specific circumstances, increase the likelihood of repression and protests. The findings indicate that in autocracies, weather disasters can induce governments to initiate repression, significantly impeding protest mobilization. Additionally, this dissertation contributes valuable insights into the importance of considering variation in mobilization structures to understand when and where sudden weather events trigger anti-government protests.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:creator>Jansesberger, Viktoria</dc:creator>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2024-04-15T12:21:35Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:title>Protest and Repression Dynamics in Disastrous Times</dcterms:title>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/69777/4/Jansesberger-2-1c2yktetsutw40.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2023</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:contributor>Jansesberger, Viktoria</dc:contributor>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2024-04-15T12:21:35Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/69777/4/Jansesberger-2-1c2yktetsutw40.pdf"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/69777"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

February 6, 2024
Hochschulschriftenvermerk
Konstanz, Univ., Diss., 2024
Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen