Publikation:

Does fMRI neurofeedback in the context of stress influence mood and arousal? : a randomised controlled trial with parallel group design

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Belardi_2-1c158f3ujqy1e3.pdf
Belardi_2-1c158f3ujqy1e3.pdfGröße: 1.38 MBDownloads: 335

Datum

2019

Autor:innen

Belardi, Angelo
Lee, Jong-Hwan
Kim, Hyun-Chul
Stalujanis, Esther
Jung, Eun Kyung
Oh, Minkyung
Yoo, Seung-Schik
Tegethoff, Marion
Meinlschmidt, Gunther

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Link zur Lizenz

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Gold
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

F1000Research. 2019, 8, 1031. eISSN 2046-1402. Available under: doi: 10.12688/f1000research.19403.1

Zusammenfassung

Background: Stress-related mental and physical health issues burden modern societies. New treatment opportunities could help to lessen long-term detrimental consequences of stress.

Objective: To investigate whether real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging neurofeedback (rtfMRInf), aimed at modulating brain activity associated with a stressor, affects subjective mood and arousal.

Methods: In total, 30 males participated in a randomised controlled trial with parallel-group design. rtfMRInf was the intervention, sham-neurofeedback the control condition, and the Stroop task the stressor. We instructed participants to modulate their stress response to the Stroop task via feedback from their anterior cingulate cortex and their insular cortex, concomitantly applying mental strategies. We assessed mood with the Multidimensional Mood State Questionnaire (dimensions: good/bad, GB; awake/tired, AT; and calm/nervous, CN), and subjective arousal with Self-Assessment Manikins (SAM).

Results: We found significantly higher subjective arousal after neurofeedback phases in the experimental condition as compared to the control condition [t(26.6) = −2.216, 95%CI [−2.188,−0.083], p = 0.035; t(27.9) = −3.252, 95%CI [−2.685,−0.609], p = 0.003], but no significant differences between the conditions regarding mood [GB: b = 0.4, 95%CI [−0.67, 1.47], p = 0.467; AT: b = 0.769, 95%CI [−0.319, 1.857], p = 0.177; CN: b = 0.5, 95%CI [−0.53, 1.53], p = 0.352]. In both conditions, there was significantly worse and more tired mood after the fMRI session as compared to before [GB:b = −0.77, 95% CI [−1.31, 0.23], p = 0.009; AT: b = −0.652, 95%CI [−1.116,−0.187], p = 0.01].

Conclusions: Findings indicate that rtfMRInf led to higher arousal, which may counteract the aim to reduce stress responses. Whether the multitasking situation has triggered this neurofeedback-related arousal – and how to circumvent it – asks for further study.

Trial registration: NCT01921088, ClinicalTrials.gov, 13th August 2013.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
150 Psychologie

Schlagwörter

arousal, dual task, multitasking, functional magnetic resonance imaging, mood, neurofeedback, psychological stress

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690BELARDI, Angelo, Jong-Hwan LEE, Hyun-Chul KIM, Esther STALUJANIS, Eun Kyung JUNG, Minkyung OH, Seung-Schik YOO, Jens C. PRUESSNER, Marion TEGETHOFF, Gunther MEINLSCHMIDT, 2019. Does fMRI neurofeedback in the context of stress influence mood and arousal? : a randomised controlled trial with parallel group design. In: F1000Research. 2019, 8, 1031. eISSN 2046-1402. Available under: doi: 10.12688/f1000research.19403.1
BibTex
@article{Belardi2019-07-09neuro-46369,
  year={2019},
  doi={10.12688/f1000research.19403.1},
  title={Does fMRI neurofeedback in the context of stress influence mood and arousal? : a randomised controlled trial with parallel group design},
  volume={8},
  journal={F1000Research},
  author={Belardi, Angelo and Lee, Jong-Hwan and Kim, Hyun-Chul and Stalujanis, Esther and Jung, Eun Kyung and Oh, Minkyung and Yoo, Seung-Schik and Pruessner, Jens C. and Tegethoff, Marion and Meinlschmidt, Gunther},
  note={Article Number: 1031}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/46369">
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Background: Stress-related mental and physical health issues burden modern societies. New treatment opportunities could help to lessen long-term detrimental consequences of stress.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Objective: To investigate whether real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging neurofeedback (rtfMRInf), aimed at modulating brain activity associated with a stressor, affects subjective mood and arousal.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Methods: In total, 30 males participated in a randomised controlled trial with parallel-group design. rtfMRInf was the intervention, sham-neurofeedback the control condition, and the Stroop task the stressor. We instructed participants to modulate their stress response to the Stroop task via feedback from their anterior cingulate cortex and their insular cortex, concomitantly applying mental strategies. We assessed mood with the Multidimensional Mood State Questionnaire (dimensions: good/bad, GB; awake/tired, AT; and calm/nervous, CN), and subjective arousal with Self-Assessment Manikins (SAM).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Results: We found significantly higher subjective arousal after neurofeedback phases in the experimental condition as compared to the control condition [t(26.6) = −2.216, 95%CI [−2.188,−0.083], p = 0.035; t(27.9) = −3.252, 95%CI [−2.685,−0.609], p = 0.003], but no significant differences between the conditions regarding mood [GB: b = 0.4, 95%CI [−0.67, 1.47], p = 0.467; AT: b = 0.769, 95%CI [−0.319, 1.857], p = 0.177; CN: b = 0.5, 95%CI [−0.53, 1.53], p = 0.352]. In both conditions, there was significantly worse and more tired mood after the fMRI session as compared to before [GB:b = −0.77, 95% CI [−1.31, 0.23], p = 0.009; AT: b = −0.652, 95%CI [−1.116,−0.187], p = 0.01].&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Conclusions: Findings indicate that rtfMRInf led to higher arousal, which may counteract the aim to reduce stress responses. Whether the multitasking situation has triggered this neurofeedback-related arousal – and how to circumvent it – asks for further study.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Trial registration: NCT01921088, ClinicalTrials.gov, 13th August 2013.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-07-15T12:56:14Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:issued>2019-07-09</dcterms:issued>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/46369"/>
    <dc:creator>Oh, Minkyung</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/>
    <dc:creator>Jung, Eun Kyung</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Lee, Jong-Hwan</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/46369/1/Belardi_2-1c158f3ujqy1e3.pdf"/>
    <dc:creator>Stalujanis, Esther</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Pruessner, Jens C.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Kim, Hyun-Chul</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Yoo, Seung-Schik</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Belardi, Angelo</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Meinlschmidt, Gunther</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Kim, Hyun-Chul</dc:contributor>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Stalujanis, Esther</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Oh, Minkyung</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Pruessner, Jens C.</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Yoo, Seung-Schik</dc:contributor>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dc:contributor>Jung, Eun Kyung</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Belardi, Angelo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-07-15T12:56:14Z</dc:date>
    <dc:creator>Tegethoff, Marion</dc:creator>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/46369/1/Belardi_2-1c158f3ujqy1e3.pdf"/>
    <dc:contributor>Tegethoff, Marion</dc:contributor>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:contributor>Lee, Jong-Hwan</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:title>Does fMRI neurofeedback in the context of stress influence mood and arousal? : a randomised controlled trial with parallel group design</dcterms:title>
    <dc:creator>Meinlschmidt, Gunther</dc:creator>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Ja
Diese Publikation teilen