Does fMRI neurofeedback in the context of stress influence mood and arousal? : a randomised controlled trial with parallel group design

dc.contributor.authorBelardi, Angelo
dc.contributor.authorLee, Jong-Hwan
dc.contributor.authorKim, Hyun-Chul
dc.contributor.authorStalujanis, Esther
dc.contributor.authorJung, Eun Kyung
dc.contributor.authorOh, Minkyung
dc.contributor.authorYoo, Seung-Schik
dc.contributor.authorPruessner, Jens C.
dc.contributor.authorTegethoff, Marion
dc.contributor.authorMeinlschmidt, Gunther
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-15T12:56:14Z
dc.date.available2019-07-15T12:56:14Z
dc.date.issued2019-07-09eng
dc.description.abstractBackground: Stress-related mental and physical health issues burden modern societies. New treatment opportunities could help to lessen long-term detrimental consequences of stress.

Objective: To investigate whether real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging neurofeedback (rtfMRInf), aimed at modulating brain activity associated with a stressor, affects subjective mood and arousal.

Methods: In total, 30 males participated in a randomised controlled trial with parallel-group design. rtfMRInf was the intervention, sham-neurofeedback the control condition, and the Stroop task the stressor. We instructed participants to modulate their stress response to the Stroop task via feedback from their anterior cingulate cortex and their insular cortex, concomitantly applying mental strategies. We assessed mood with the Multidimensional Mood State Questionnaire (dimensions: good/bad, GB; awake/tired, AT; and calm/nervous, CN), and subjective arousal with Self-Assessment Manikins (SAM).

Results: We found significantly higher subjective arousal after neurofeedback phases in the experimental condition as compared to the control condition [t(26.6) = −2.216, 95%CI [−2.188,−0.083], p = 0.035; t(27.9) = −3.252, 95%CI [−2.685,−0.609], p = 0.003], but no significant differences between the conditions regarding mood [GB: b = 0.4, 95%CI [−0.67, 1.47], p = 0.467; AT: b = 0.769, 95%CI [−0.319, 1.857], p = 0.177; CN: b = 0.5, 95%CI [−0.53, 1.53], p = 0.352]. In both conditions, there was significantly worse and more tired mood after the fMRI session as compared to before [GB:b = −0.77, 95% CI [−1.31, 0.23], p = 0.009; AT: b = −0.652, 95%CI [−1.116,−0.187], p = 0.01].

Conclusions: Findings indicate that rtfMRInf led to higher arousal, which may counteract the aim to reduce stress responses. Whether the multitasking situation has triggered this neurofeedback-related arousal – and how to circumvent it – asks for further study.

Trial registration: NCT01921088, ClinicalTrials.gov, 13th August 2013.
eng
dc.description.versionpublishedde
dc.identifier.doi10.12688/f1000research.19403.1eng
dc.identifier.ppn1669261689
dc.identifier.urihttps://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/46369
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectarousal, dual task, multitasking, functional magnetic resonance imaging, mood, neurofeedback, psychological stresseng
dc.subject.ddc150eng
dc.titleDoes fMRI neurofeedback in the context of stress influence mood and arousal? : a randomised controlled trial with parallel group designeng
dc.typeJOURNAL_ARTICLEde
dspace.entity.typePublication
kops.citation.bibtex
@article{Belardi2019-07-09neuro-46369,
  year={2019},
  doi={10.12688/f1000research.19403.1},
  title={Does fMRI neurofeedback in the context of stress influence mood and arousal? : a randomised controlled trial with parallel group design},
  volume={8},
  journal={F1000Research},
  author={Belardi, Angelo and Lee, Jong-Hwan and Kim, Hyun-Chul and Stalujanis, Esther and Jung, Eun Kyung and Oh, Minkyung and Yoo, Seung-Schik and Pruessner, Jens C. and Tegethoff, Marion and Meinlschmidt, Gunther},
  note={Article Number: 1031}
}
kops.citation.iso690BELARDI, Angelo, Jong-Hwan LEE, Hyun-Chul KIM, Esther STALUJANIS, Eun Kyung JUNG, Minkyung OH, Seung-Schik YOO, Jens C. PRUESSNER, Marion TEGETHOFF, Gunther MEINLSCHMIDT, 2019. Does fMRI neurofeedback in the context of stress influence mood and arousal? : a randomised controlled trial with parallel group design. In: F1000Research. 2019, 8, 1031. eISSN 2046-1402. Available under: doi: 10.12688/f1000research.19403.1deu
kops.citation.iso690BELARDI, Angelo, Jong-Hwan LEE, Hyun-Chul KIM, Esther STALUJANIS, Eun Kyung JUNG, Minkyung OH, Seung-Schik YOO, Jens C. PRUESSNER, Marion TEGETHOFF, Gunther MEINLSCHMIDT, 2019. Does fMRI neurofeedback in the context of stress influence mood and arousal? : a randomised controlled trial with parallel group design. In: F1000Research. 2019, 8, 1031. eISSN 2046-1402. Available under: doi: 10.12688/f1000research.19403.1eng
kops.citation.rdf
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/46369">
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Background: Stress-related mental and physical health issues burden modern societies. New treatment opportunities could help to lessen long-term detrimental consequences of stress.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Objective: To investigate whether real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging neurofeedback (rtfMRInf), aimed at modulating brain activity associated with a stressor, affects subjective mood and arousal.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Methods: In total, 30 males participated in a randomised controlled trial with parallel-group design. rtfMRInf was the intervention, sham-neurofeedback the control condition, and the Stroop task the stressor. We instructed participants to modulate their stress response to the Stroop task via feedback from their anterior cingulate cortex and their insular cortex, concomitantly applying mental strategies. We assessed mood with the Multidimensional Mood State Questionnaire (dimensions: good/bad, GB; awake/tired, AT; and calm/nervous, CN), and subjective arousal with Self-Assessment Manikins (SAM).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Results: We found significantly higher subjective arousal after neurofeedback phases in the experimental condition as compared to the control condition [t(26.6) = −2.216, 95%CI [−2.188,−0.083], p = 0.035; t(27.9) = −3.252, 95%CI [−2.685,−0.609], p = 0.003], but no significant differences between the conditions regarding mood [GB: b = 0.4, 95%CI [−0.67, 1.47], p = 0.467; AT: b = 0.769, 95%CI [−0.319, 1.857], p = 0.177; CN: b = 0.5, 95%CI [−0.53, 1.53], p = 0.352]. In both conditions, there was significantly worse and more tired mood after the fMRI session as compared to before [GB:b = −0.77, 95% CI [−1.31, 0.23], p = 0.009; AT: b = −0.652, 95%CI [−1.116,−0.187], p = 0.01].&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Conclusions: Findings indicate that rtfMRInf led to higher arousal, which may counteract the aim to reduce stress responses. Whether the multitasking situation has triggered this neurofeedback-related arousal – and how to circumvent it – asks for further study.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Trial registration: NCT01921088, ClinicalTrials.gov, 13th August 2013.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-07-15T12:56:14Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:issued>2019-07-09</dcterms:issued>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/46369"/>
    <dc:creator>Oh, Minkyung</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/>
    <dc:creator>Jung, Eun Kyung</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Lee, Jong-Hwan</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/46369/1/Belardi_2-1c158f3ujqy1e3.pdf"/>
    <dc:creator>Stalujanis, Esther</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Pruessner, Jens C.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Kim, Hyun-Chul</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Yoo, Seung-Schik</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Belardi, Angelo</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Meinlschmidt, Gunther</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Kim, Hyun-Chul</dc:contributor>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Stalujanis, Esther</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Oh, Minkyung</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Pruessner, Jens C.</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Yoo, Seung-Schik</dc:contributor>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dc:contributor>Jung, Eun Kyung</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Belardi, Angelo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-07-15T12:56:14Z</dc:date>
    <dc:creator>Tegethoff, Marion</dc:creator>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/46369/1/Belardi_2-1c158f3ujqy1e3.pdf"/>
    <dc:contributor>Tegethoff, Marion</dc:contributor>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:contributor>Lee, Jong-Hwan</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:title>Does fMRI neurofeedback in the context of stress influence mood and arousal? : a randomised controlled trial with parallel group design</dcterms:title>
    <dc:creator>Meinlschmidt, Gunther</dc:creator>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
kops.description.openAccessopenaccessgoldeng
kops.flag.isPeerReviewedtrueeng
kops.flag.knbibliographytrue
kops.identifier.nbnurn:nbn:de:bsz:352-2-1c158f3ujqy1e3
kops.sourcefieldF1000Research. 2019, <b>8</b>, 1031. eISSN 2046-1402. Available under: doi: 10.12688/f1000research.19403.1deu
kops.sourcefield.plainF1000Research. 2019, 8, 1031. eISSN 2046-1402. Available under: doi: 10.12688/f1000research.19403.1deu
kops.sourcefield.plainF1000Research. 2019, 8, 1031. eISSN 2046-1402. Available under: doi: 10.12688/f1000research.19403.1eng
relation.isAuthorOfPublication153324a0-c321-4cfb-a112-90179871cd94
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery153324a0-c321-4cfb-a112-90179871cd94
source.bibliographicInfo.articleNumber1031eng
source.bibliographicInfo.volume8eng
source.identifier.eissn2046-1402eng
source.periodicalTitleF1000Researcheng

Dateien

Originalbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
Name:
Belardi_2-1c158f3ujqy1e3.pdf
Größe:
1.38 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Beschreibung:
Belardi_2-1c158f3ujqy1e3.pdf
Belardi_2-1c158f3ujqy1e3.pdfGröße: 1.38 MBDownloads: 393