Publikation:

Developments in collective redress : what's new in the "New German KapMuG"?

Vorschaubild

Dateien

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

Datum

2013

Autor:innen

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

URI (zitierfähiger Link)
http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-263671
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung

Sammlungen

Rechtswissenschaft: Publikationen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

European business law review. 2013, 24(6), pp. 731-749. ISSN 0959-6941

Zusammenfassung

The landscape of collective redress in Europe is quite heterogeneous. Whereas some Member States compete with each other for attracting mass damage cases for either litigation or settlement proceedings, Germany remains reluctant to implement new instruments of collective redress. The most important regulation in Germany is the Capital Market Model Case Act enacted in 2005 - the legislature's reaction to the "Deutsche Telekom" securities litigation in Frankfurt. The act was restricted to cases arising under securities regulations and was highly controversial from the outset. In November 2012, following an evaluation of the act, some moderate changes came into force. This article will present the background and some essential features of the reform. It will argue that the German government and legislator could not bring themselves to take more than another half-hearted reform step.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
340 Recht

Schlagwörter

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690STADLER, Astrid, 2013. Developments in collective redress : what's new in the "New German KapMuG"?. In: European business law review. 2013, 24(6), pp. 731-749. ISSN 0959-6941
BibTex
@article{Stadler2013Devel-26367,
  year={2013},
  title={Developments in collective redress : what's new in the "New German KapMuG"?},
  number={6},
  volume={24},
  issn={0959-6941},
  journal={European business law review},
  pages={731--749},
  author={Stadler, Astrid}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/26367">
    <dc:creator>Stadler, Astrid</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>European business law review ; 24 (2013), 6. - S. 731-749</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/26367"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:title>Developments in collective redress : what's new in the "New German KapMuG"?</dcterms:title>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/44"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/44"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2014-02-13T13:54:54Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:issued>2013</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The landscape of collective redress in Europe is quite heterogeneous. Whereas some Member States compete with each other for attracting mass damage cases for either litigation or settlement proceedings, Germany remains reluctant to implement new instruments of collective redress. The most important regulation in Germany is the Capital Market Model Case Act enacted in 2005 - the legislature's reaction to the "Deutsche Telekom" securities litigation in Frankfurt. The act was restricted to cases arising under securities regulations and was highly controversial from the outset. In November 2012, following an evaluation of the act, some moderate changes came into force. This article will present the background and some essential features of the reform. It will argue that the German government and legislator could not bring themselves to take more than another half-hearted reform step.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2014-02-13T13:54:54Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:contributor>Stadler, Astrid</dc:contributor>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen