Publikation:

Puzzling Answers to Crosswise Questions : Examining Overall Prevalence Rates, Response Order Effects, and Learning Effects

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Walzenbach_2-1as4f75r4buak0.pdf
Walzenbach_2-1as4f75r4buak0.pdfGröße: 595.66 KBDownloads: 25

Datum

2023

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Gold
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Survey Research Methods. European Survey Research Association. 2023, 17(1), pp. 1-13. eISSN 1864-3361. Available under: doi: 10.18148/srm/2023.v17i1.8010

Zusammenfassung

This validation study on the crosswise model (CM) examines five survey experiments that were implemented in a general population survey. Our first crucial result is that in none of these experiments was the crosswise model able to verifiably reduce social desirability bias. In contrast to most previous CM applications, we use an experimental design that allows us to distinguish a reduction in social desirability bias from heuristic response behaviour, such as random ticking, leading to false positive or false negative answers. In addition, we provide insights on two potential explanatory mechanisms that have not yet received attention in empirical studies: primacy effects and panel conditioning. We do not find consistent primacy effects, nor does response quality improve due to learning when respondents have had experiences with crosswise models in past survey waves. We interpret our results as evidence that the crosswise model does not work in general population surveys and speculate that the question format causes mistrust in participants.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
300 Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie

Schlagwörter

crosswise model, randomized response, social desirability bias, primacy effects, learning effects, panel conditioning, privacy concerns

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690WALZENBACH, Sandra, Thomas HINZ, 2023. Puzzling Answers to Crosswise Questions : Examining Overall Prevalence Rates, Response Order Effects, and Learning Effects. In: Survey Research Methods. European Survey Research Association. 2023, 17(1), pp. 1-13. eISSN 1864-3361. Available under: doi: 10.18148/srm/2023.v17i1.8010
BibTex
@article{Walzenbach2023Puzzl-66602,
  year={2023},
  doi={10.18148/srm/2023.v17i1.8010},
  title={Puzzling Answers to Crosswise Questions : Examining Overall Prevalence Rates, Response Order Effects, and Learning Effects},
  number={1},
  volume={17},
  journal={Survey Research Methods},
  pages={1--13},
  author={Walzenbach, Sandra and Hinz, Thomas}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/66602">
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-04-17T06:23:37Z</dc:date>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/34"/>
    <dc:creator>Hinz, Thomas</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Hinz, Thomas</dc:contributor>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:title>Puzzling Answers to Crosswise Questions : Examining Overall Prevalence Rates, Response Order Effects, and Learning Effects</dcterms:title>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2023</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:abstract>This validation study on the crosswise model (CM) examines five survey experiments that were implemented in a general population survey. Our first crucial result is that in none of these experiments was the crosswise model able to verifiably reduce social desirability bias. In contrast to most previous CM applications, we use an experimental design that allows us to distinguish a reduction in social desirability bias from heuristic response behaviour, such as random ticking, leading to false positive or false negative answers. In addition, we provide insights on two potential explanatory mechanisms that have not yet received attention in empirical studies: primacy effects and panel conditioning. We do not find consistent primacy effects, nor does response quality improve due to learning when respondents have had experiences with crosswise models in past survey waves. We interpret our results as evidence that the crosswise model does not work in general population surveys and speculate that the question format causes mistrust in participants.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-04-17T06:23:37Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:contributor>Walzenbach, Sandra</dc:contributor>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/66602/1/Walzenbach_2-1as4f75r4buak0.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/66602"/>
    <dc:creator>Walzenbach, Sandra</dc:creator>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/66602/1/Walzenbach_2-1as4f75r4buak0.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/34"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Ja
Diese Publikation teilen