Publikation: Why Frege Did Not Plagiarize the Stoics : More on the Relationship Between Fregean and Stoic Logic
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
In this paper we give a detailed comparison of the key elements of Frege’s formal language of thought and apparently similar views in Stoic formal logic. That is, we compare their views on the following topics: connectives, negation, simple sentences, propositional content, predicates and their incompleteness, and quantifications. We show that in most of these cases the similarities between Frege’s views and the Stoic views are only superficial. Frege’s views are far more systematic, better developed and can in no case directly or fully be traced back to Stoic ideas. Furthermore, we show that Prantl, pace Bobzien 2021, is in most of these cases not a reliable source with respect to Stoic logic and that it is very unlikely that Frege’s views on logic were influenced by Prantl’s interpretation of Stoic formal logic.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
RAMI, Dolf, Gottfried GABRIEL, Karlheinz HÜLSER, 2024. Why Frege Did Not Plagiarize the Stoics : More on the Relationship Between Fregean and Stoic Logic. In: History and Philosophy of Logic. Taylor & Francis. 2024, 45(4), S. 435-459. ISSN 0144-5340. eISSN 1464-5149. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1080/01445340.2024.2333689BibTex
@article{Rami2024-10Frege-71398, year={2024}, doi={10.1080/01445340.2024.2333689}, title={Why Frege Did Not Plagiarize the Stoics : More on the Relationship Between Fregean and Stoic Logic}, number={4}, volume={45}, issn={0144-5340}, journal={History and Philosophy of Logic}, pages={435--459}, author={Rami, Dolf and Gabriel, Gottfried and Hülser, Karlheinz} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/71398"> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2024-11-22T08:44:35Z</dcterms:available> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/71398"/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2024-11-22T08:44:35Z</dc:date> <dc:creator>Gabriel, Gottfried</dc:creator> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/> <dc:contributor>Gabriel, Gottfried</dc:contributor> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dcterms:issued>2024-10</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:abstract>In this paper we give a detailed comparison of the key elements of Frege’s formal language of thought and apparently similar views in Stoic formal logic. That is, we compare their views on the following topics: connectives, negation, simple sentences, propositional content, predicates and their incompleteness, and quantifications. We show that in most of these cases the similarities between Frege’s views and the Stoic views are only superficial. Frege’s views are far more systematic, better developed and can in no case directly or fully be traced back to Stoic ideas. Furthermore, we show that Prantl, pace Bobzien 2021, is in most of these cases not a reliable source with respect to Stoic logic and that it is very unlikely that Frege’s views on logic were influenced by Prantl’s interpretation of Stoic formal logic.</dcterms:abstract> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/71398/1/Rami_2-18xtqo0bqf8qo0.pdf"/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:creator>Hülser, Karlheinz</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Rami, Dolf</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Rami, Dolf</dc:creator> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/71398/1/Rami_2-18xtqo0bqf8qo0.pdf"/> <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights> <dcterms:title>Why Frege Did Not Plagiarize the Stoics : More on the Relationship Between Fregean and Stoic Logic</dcterms:title> <dc:contributor>Hülser, Karlheinz</dc:contributor> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>