Publikation:

Reply to Jim Woodward's Comments on Wolfgang Spohn's Laws of Belief

Vorschaubild

Dateien

Spohn_2-18rlkl0p4pywr4.PDF
Spohn_2-18rlkl0p4pywr4.PDFGröße: 91.01 KBDownloads: 63

Datum

2019

Autor:innen

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

URI (zitierfähiger Link)
http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-2-18rlkl0p4pywr4
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
https://doi.org/10.1086/704982
ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Link zur Lizenz
Urheberrechtlich geschützt

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green

Sammlungen

Philosophie: Publikationen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Philosophy of Science. 2019, 86(4), pp. 773-784. ISSN 0031-8248. eISSN 1539-767X. Available under: doi: 10.1086/704982

Zusammenfassung

This is one of a pair of discussion notes comparing some features of the account of causation in Spohn’s Laws of Belief (2012) with the “interventionist” account in Woodward’s Making Things Happen (2003). This note locates the core difference of the accounts in the fact that Woodward’s account follows an epistemological order, while Spohn’s follows a conceptual order. This unfolds in five further differences: (i) type- vs. token-level causation, (ii) reference to time, (iii) actual/counterfactual intervention vs. epistemic/suppositional wiggling, (iv) a circular vs. a circle-free conception of the circumstances of a direct causal relation, and (v) absolute vs. model-relative causation.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
100 Philosophie

Schlagwörter

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690SPOHN, Wolfgang, 2019. Reply to Jim Woodward's Comments on Wolfgang Spohn's Laws of Belief. In: Philosophy of Science. 2019, 86(4), pp. 773-784. ISSN 0031-8248. eISSN 1539-767X. Available under: doi: 10.1086/704982
BibTex
@article{Spohn2019-10Reply-46103,
  year={2019},
  doi={10.1086/704982},
  title={Reply to Jim Woodward's Comments on Wolfgang Spohn's Laws of Belief},
  number={4},
  volume={86},
  issn={0031-8248},
  journal={Philosophy of Science},
  pages={773--784},
  author={Spohn, Wolfgang}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/46103">
    <dcterms:title>Reply to Jim Woodward's Comments on Wolfgang Spohn's Laws of Belief</dcterms:title>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-06-25T14:16:16Z</dc:date>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/46103"/>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-06-25T14:16:16Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This is one of a pair of discussion notes comparing some features of the account of causation in Spohn’s Laws of Belief (2012) with the “interventionist” account in Woodward’s Making Things Happen (2003). This note locates the core difference of the accounts in the fact that Woodward’s account follows an epistemological order, while Spohn’s follows a conceptual order. This unfolds in five further differences: (i) type- vs. token-level causation, (ii) reference to time, (iii) actual/counterfactual intervention vs. epistemic/suppositional wiggling, (iv) a circular vs. a circle-free conception of the circumstances of a direct causal relation, and (v) absolute vs. model-relative causation.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:issued>2019-10</dcterms:issued>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/46103/1/Spohn_2-18rlkl0p4pywr4.PDF"/>
    <dc:creator>Spohn, Wolfgang</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/46103/1/Spohn_2-18rlkl0p4pywr4.PDF"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <dc:contributor>Spohn, Wolfgang</dc:contributor>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Ja
Diese Publikation teilen