Publikation: Toward Good Read-Across Practice (GRAP) guidance
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
Grouping of substances and utilizing read-across of data within those groups represents an important data gap filling technique for chemical safety assessments. Categories/analogue groups are typically developed based on structural similarity and, increasingly often, also on mechanistic (biological) similarity. While read-across can play a key role in complying with legislations such as the European REACH regulation, the lack of consensus regarding the extent and type of evidence necessary to support it often hampers its successful application and acceptance by regulatory authorities. Despite a potentially broad user community, expertise is still concentrated across a handful of organizations and individuals. In order to facilitate the effective use of read-across, this document aims to summarize the state-of-the-art, summarizes insights learned from reviewing ECHA published decisions as far as the relative successes/pitfalls surrounding read-across under REACH and compile the relevant activities and guidance documents. Special emphasis is given to the available existing tools and approaches, an analysis of ECHA's published final decisions associated with all levels of compliance checks and testing proposals, the consideration and expression of uncertainty, the use of biological support data and the impact of the ECHA Read-Across Assessment Framework (RAAF) published in 2015.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
BALL, Nicholas, Mark T. D. CRONIN, Jie SHEN, Karen BLACKBURN, Ewan D. BOOTH, Mounir BOUHIFD, Elizabeth DONLEY, Laura EGNASH, Charles HASTINGS, Daland R. JUBERG, Thomas HARTUNG, 2016. Toward Good Read-Across Practice (GRAP) guidance. In: ALTEX. 2016, 33(2), pp. 149-166. ISSN 0946-7785. eISSN 1868-8551. Available under: doi: 10.14573/altex.1601251BibTex
@article{Ball2016Towar-36596, year={2016}, doi={10.14573/altex.1601251}, title={Toward Good Read-Across Practice (GRAP) guidance}, number={2}, volume={33}, issn={0946-7785}, journal={ALTEX}, pages={149--166}, author={Ball, Nicholas and Cronin, Mark T. D. and Shen, Jie and Blackburn, Karen and Booth, Ewan D. and Bouhifd, Mounir and Donley, Elizabeth and Egnash, Laura and Hastings, Charles and Juberg, Daland R. and Hartung, Thomas} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/36596"> <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights> <dc:creator>Egnash, Laura</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Bouhifd, Mounir</dc:creator> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/> <dc:creator>Ball, Nicholas</dc:creator> <dcterms:issued>2016</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/> <dc:contributor>Bouhifd, Mounir</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Cronin, Mark T. D.</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Hartung, Thomas</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Hastings, Charles</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Blackburn, Karen</dc:creator> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/36596/3/Ball_0-365922.pdf"/> <dc:contributor>Blackburn, Karen</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Juberg, Daland R.</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Hastings, Charles</dc:contributor> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:contributor>Booth, Ewan D.</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Hartung, Thomas</dc:contributor> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/36596/3/Ball_0-365922.pdf"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-01-12T07:46:51Z</dcterms:available> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dc:contributor>Donley, Elizabeth</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Booth, Ewan D.</dc:creator> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/36596"/> <dcterms:title>Toward Good Read-Across Practice (GRAP) guidance</dcterms:title> <dc:creator>Shen, Jie</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Juberg, Daland R.</dc:creator> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-01-12T07:46:51Z</dc:date> <dc:contributor>Shen, Jie</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Cronin, Mark T. D.</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Ball, Nicholas</dc:contributor> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Grouping of substances and utilizing read-across of data within those groups represents an important data gap filling technique for chemical safety assessments. Categories/analogue groups are typically developed based on structural similarity and, increasingly often, also on mechanistic (biological) similarity. While read-across can play a key role in complying with legislations such as the European REACH regulation, the lack of consensus regarding the extent and type of evidence necessary to support it often hampers its successful application and acceptance by regulatory authorities. Despite a potentially broad user community, expertise is still concentrated across a handful of organizations and individuals. In order to facilitate the effective use of read-across, this document aims to summarize the state-of-the-art, summarizes insights learned from reviewing ECHA published decisions as far as the relative successes/pitfalls surrounding read-across under REACH and compile the relevant activities and guidance documents. Special emphasis is given to the available existing tools and approaches, an analysis of ECHA's published final decisions associated with all levels of compliance checks and testing proposals, the consideration and expression of uncertainty, the use of biological support data and the impact of the ECHA Read-Across Assessment Framework (RAAF) published in 2015.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:creator>Donley, Elizabeth</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Egnash, Laura</dc:contributor> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>