Publikation: How Do Intermediaries Shape News-Related Media Repertoires and Practices? : Findings From a Qualitative Study
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
Online intermediaries such as search engines, social network sites, or video platforms provide access to diverse content; however, there is a school of thought that argues that they may also contribute to the structural deformation of the public sphere. To assess the impact of these Web-based services, research needs to address them not as isolated platforms but as part of broader media environments. Based on 6 group discussions and 18 interviews with German participants varying in age and political engagement, we mapped individual information repertoires with a particular focus on online intermediaries, reconstructed key episodes in which these services were used for gathering information on current news events, and investigated participants’ awareness of the architecture and mechanisms of these intermediaries. Findings show that for most participants, online intermediaries are an indispensable part of their media repertoires, but are seldom dominant, let alone the only source of information on political topics. Most respondents possessed some knowledge on the basic workings of the intermediaries they used, but were not familiar with details such as algorithmic personalization.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
SCHMIDT, Jan-Hinrik, Lisa MERTEN, Uwe HASEBRINK, Isabelle PETRICH, Amelie ROLFS, 2019. How Do Intermediaries Shape News-Related Media Repertoires and Practices? : Findings From a Qualitative Study. In: International Journal of Communication. University of Southern California. 2019, 13, pp. 853-873. eISSN 1932-8036BibTex
@article{Schmidt2019Inter-54463, year={2019}, title={How Do Intermediaries Shape News-Related Media Repertoires and Practices? : Findings From a Qualitative Study}, url={https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/9080}, volume={13}, journal={International Journal of Communication}, pages={853--873}, author={Schmidt, Jan-Hinrik and Merten, Lisa and Hasebrink, Uwe and Petrich, Isabelle and Rolfs, Amelie} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/54463"> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/> <dcterms:title>How Do Intermediaries Shape News-Related Media Repertoires and Practices? : Findings From a Qualitative Study</dcterms:title> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dc:creator>Rolfs, Amelie</dc:creator> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/54463"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-07-29T15:04:09Z</dcterms:available> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:creator>Schmidt, Jan-Hinrik</dc:creator> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/> <dc:contributor>Schmidt, Jan-Hinrik</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Merten, Lisa</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Merten, Lisa</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Petrich, Isabelle</dc:contributor> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dcterms:issued>2019</dcterms:issued> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-07-29T15:04:09Z</dc:date> <dc:creator>Petrich, Isabelle</dc:creator> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/54463/1/Schmidt_2-167mueybt8wm25.pdf"/> <dc:creator>Hasebrink, Uwe</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Rolfs, Amelie</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Hasebrink, Uwe</dc:contributor> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/54463/1/Schmidt_2-167mueybt8wm25.pdf"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Online intermediaries such as search engines, social network sites, or video platforms provide access to diverse content; however, there is a school of thought that argues that they may also contribute to the structural deformation of the public sphere. To assess the impact of these Web-based services, research needs to address them not as isolated platforms but as part of broader media environments. Based on 6 group discussions and 18 interviews with German participants varying in age and political engagement, we mapped individual information repertoires with a particular focus on online intermediaries, reconstructed key episodes in which these services were used for gathering information on current news events, and investigated participants’ awareness of the architecture and mechanisms of these intermediaries. Findings show that for most participants, online intermediaries are an indispensable part of their media repertoires, but are seldom dominant, let alone the only source of information on political topics. Most respondents possessed some knowledge on the basic workings of the intermediaries they used, but were not familiar with details such as algorithmic personalization.</dcterms:abstract> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>