Publikation:

Conditional Solidarity : A Comparative Analysis of Government Egalitarianism and Benefit Conditionalization in Boom and Bust

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Horn_2-15ujczxlg9rpw0.pdf
Horn_2-15ujczxlg9rpw0.pdfGröße: 276.13 KBDownloads: 87

Datum

2018

Autor:innen

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis. Taylor & Francis. 2018, 20(5), pp. 451-468. ISSN 1387-6988. eISSN 1572-5448. Available under: doi: 10.1080/13876988.2017.1368192

Zusammenfassung

Surveys show that welfare benefits are regarded as more legitimate if the beneficiaries are perceived as victims of systemic circumstances; that their legitimacy is sensitive to economic context; and that egalitarians are more supportive of benefits. Applying these insights to macro-comparative research, this paper shows that “conditional solidarity” – not partisanship – explains the puzzling countercyclical policy pattern of “conditionalization in good times” that characterizes changes in access to unemployment insurance in the OECD. The argument is that the effect of a government’s egalitarian views depends on the business cycle because the legitimacy of benefits is inversely related to macroeconomic performance.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
320 Politik

Schlagwörter

economic performance; comparative welfare research; conditional solidarity; egalitarianism; regression

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690HORN, Alexander, 2018. Conditional Solidarity : A Comparative Analysis of Government Egalitarianism and Benefit Conditionalization in Boom and Bust. In: Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis. Taylor & Francis. 2018, 20(5), pp. 451-468. ISSN 1387-6988. eISSN 1572-5448. Available under: doi: 10.1080/13876988.2017.1368192
BibTex
@article{Horn2018-10-20Condi-50835,
  year={2018},
  doi={10.1080/13876988.2017.1368192},
  title={Conditional Solidarity : A Comparative Analysis of Government Egalitarianism and Benefit Conditionalization in Boom and Bust},
  number={5},
  volume={20},
  issn={1387-6988},
  journal={Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis},
  pages={451--468},
  author={Horn, Alexander}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/50835">
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dcterms:title>Conditional Solidarity : A Comparative Analysis of Government Egalitarianism and Benefit Conditionalization in Boom and Bust</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Surveys show that welfare benefits are regarded as more legitimate if the beneficiaries are perceived as victims of systemic circumstances; that their legitimacy is sensitive to economic context; and that egalitarians are more supportive of benefits. Applying these insights to macro-comparative research, this paper shows that “conditional solidarity” – not partisanship – explains the puzzling countercyclical policy pattern of “conditionalization in good times” that characterizes changes in access to unemployment insurance in the OECD. The argument is that the effect of a government’s egalitarian views depends on the business cycle because the legitimacy of benefits is inversely related to macroeconomic performance.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:contributor>Horn, Alexander</dc:contributor>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:creator>Horn, Alexander</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:issued>2018-10-20</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-09-15T09:20:07Z</dc:date>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-09-15T09:20:07Z</dcterms:available>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/50835/1/Horn_2-15ujczxlg9rpw0.pdf"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/50835"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/50835/1/Horn_2-15ujczxlg9rpw0.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Nein
Begutachtet
Unbekannt
Diese Publikation teilen