Publikation:

Variations of Gender Gaps in the Labour Market Outcomes of Graduates across Fields of Study : A (Combined) Test of Two Theories

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Galos_2-15sgatmdnp2a51.pdf
Galos_2-15sgatmdnp2a51.pdfGröße: 661.84 KBDownloads: 11

Datum

2023

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Link zur Lizenz

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Hybrid
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Sociology. Sage. 2023, 57(4), S. 882-903. ISSN 0038-0385. eISSN 1469-8684. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1177/00380385221122400

Zusammenfassung

Unequal gender outcomes in occupational success unravel through different channels in higher education. Using the AlmaLaurea dataset comprised of 80% of Italian graduates and 98 fields of study, this article investigates whether men and women receive similar returns on employment and earnings when choosing the same field of study. Two complementary perspectives are applied – Kanter’s theory of relative numbers and the status theory of gender – to examine the quantitative and qualitative differences between fields. The results show that the most gender ‘balanced’ fields of study are the most gender unequal in terms of earnings and employment. Separate analyses demonstrate that the status of a field interacts with its gender composition, and gender gaps in female-intensive nurturing fields shrink faster with an increasing proportion of women, albeit at higher absolute levels compared with non-nurturing fields. Therefore, nurturing fields of study should not necessarily be considered as levelling gender inequality in the labour market.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
300 Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie

Schlagwörter

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690GALOS, Diana Roxana, Nevena KULIC, 2023. Variations of Gender Gaps in the Labour Market Outcomes of Graduates across Fields of Study : A (Combined) Test of Two Theories. In: Sociology. Sage. 2023, 57(4), S. 882-903. ISSN 0038-0385. eISSN 1469-8684. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1177/00380385221122400
BibTex
@article{Galos2023Varia-59273,
  year={2023},
  doi={10.1177/00380385221122400},
  title={Variations of Gender Gaps in the Labour Market Outcomes of Graduates across Fields of Study : A (Combined) Test of Two Theories},
  number={4},
  volume={57},
  issn={0038-0385},
  journal={Sociology},
  pages={882--903},
  author={Galos, Diana Roxana and Kulic, Nevena}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/59273">
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/34"/>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/>
    <dcterms:title>Variations of Gender Gaps in the Labour Market Outcomes of Graduates across Fields of Study : A (Combined) Test of Two Theories</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/59273/1/Galos_2-15sgatmdnp2a51.pdf"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/59273"/>
    <dc:contributor>Galos, Diana Roxana</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:issued>2023</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/59273/1/Galos_2-15sgatmdnp2a51.pdf"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Unequal gender outcomes in occupational success unravel through different channels in higher education. Using the AlmaLaurea dataset comprised of 80% of Italian graduates and 98 fields of study, this article investigates whether men and women receive similar returns on employment and earnings when choosing the same field of study. Two complementary perspectives are applied – Kanter’s theory of relative numbers and the status theory of gender – to examine the quantitative and qualitative differences between fields. The results show that the most gender ‘balanced’ fields of study are the most gender unequal in terms of earnings and employment. Separate analyses demonstrate that the status of a field interacts with its gender composition, and gender gaps in female-intensive nurturing fields shrink faster with an increasing proportion of women, albeit at higher absolute levels compared with non-nurturing fields. Therefore, nurturing fields of study should not necessarily be considered as levelling gender inequality in the labour market.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:creator>Kulic, Nevena</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/34"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-11-25T07:47:15Z</dcterms:available>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-11-25T07:47:15Z</dc:date>
    <dc:creator>Galos, Diana Roxana</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Kulic, Nevena</dc:contributor>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Nein
Begutachtet
Unbekannt
Diese Publikation teilen