Publikation: Children's Act Evaluation and Emotion Attribution Reasoning Regarding Different Moral Transgressions
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
This study investigated patterns of reasoning regarding different types of moral transgressions and different measures of moral development in children 6–8 years of age (N = 130). The findings documented different patterns of reasoning for each measure and for transgressions including different moral principles. Children distinguished between their understanding of their emotional response to a transgression and the moral violation that has occurred, using much more moral reasoning when justifying act evaluations and much more self-interest reasoning when justifying emotion attributions. Children also differentiated between different types of moral violations—that is, transgressions including different moral principles. Stories about others' welfare elicited reasoning related to others' welfare, stories about fairness elicited reasoning related to equality/rights/fairness, and a multifaceted story elicited both types of moral reasoning.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
BEISSERT, Hanna, Kelly L. MULVEY, Melanie KILLEN, 2018. Children's Act Evaluation and Emotion Attribution Reasoning Regarding Different Moral Transgressions. In: Merrill-Palmer Quarterly. Wayne State University Press. 2018, 64(2), pp. 195-219. ISSN 0272-930X. eISSN 1535-0266. Available under: doi: 10.13110/merrpalmquar1982.64.2.0195BibTex
@article{Beiert2018Child-54283, year={2018}, doi={10.13110/merrpalmquar1982.64.2.0195}, title={Children's Act Evaluation and Emotion Attribution Reasoning Regarding Different Moral Transgressions}, url={https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.13110/merrpalmquar1982.64.2.0195}, number={2}, volume={64}, issn={0272-930X}, journal={Merrill-Palmer Quarterly}, pages={195--219}, author={Beißert, Hanna and Mulvey, Kelly L. and Killen, Melanie} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/54283"> <dc:creator>Beißert, Hanna</dc:creator> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/31"/> <dc:creator>Mulvey, Kelly L.</dc:creator> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:contributor>Mulvey, Kelly L.</dc:contributor> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:title>Children's Act Evaluation and Emotion Attribution Reasoning Regarding Different Moral Transgressions</dcterms:title> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-07-13T07:21:04Z</dc:date> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/31"/> <dc:contributor>Beißert, Hanna</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Killen, Melanie</dc:contributor> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-07-13T07:21:04Z</dcterms:available> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/54283"/> <dcterms:issued>2018</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This study investigated patterns of reasoning regarding different types of moral transgressions and different measures of moral development in children 6–8 years of age (N = 130). The findings documented different patterns of reasoning for each measure and for transgressions including different moral principles. Children distinguished between their understanding of their emotional response to a transgression and the moral violation that has occurred, using much more moral reasoning when justifying act evaluations and much more self-interest reasoning when justifying emotion attributions. Children also differentiated between different types of moral violations—that is, transgressions including different moral principles. Stories about others' welfare elicited reasoning related to others' welfare, stories about fairness elicited reasoning related to equality/rights/fairness, and a multifaceted story elicited both types of moral reasoning.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:creator>Killen, Melanie</dc:creator> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>