Publikation: Alternatives to histories? : employing a local notion of modal consistency in branching theories
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
Branching theories are popular frameworks for modeling objective indeterminism in the form of a future of open possibilities. In such theories, the notion of a history plays a crucial role: it is both a basic ingredient in the axiomatic definition of the framework, and it is used as a parameter of truth in semantics for languages with a future tense. Furthermore, histories—complete possible courses of events—ground the notion of modal consistency: a set of events is modally con- sistent iff there is a history containing that set. We will explain these roles of histories and highlight some critical aspects having to do with the fact that histories are global and, in a relevant sense, "big" objects. The notion of modal consistency, on the other hand, has both local and global aspects. We ask in how far a local notion of modal consistency can serve as an alternative to the common uses of histories, and work out two recent approaches to alternatives to histories. Com- bining these approaches, we develop a novel semantics for branching time.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
MÜLLER, Thomas, 2013. Alternatives to histories? : employing a local notion of modal consistency in branching theories. In: Erkenntnis. 2013, 79(S3), pp. 343-364. ISSN 0165-0106. eISSN 1572-8420. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s10670-013-9453-4BibTex
@article{Muller2013Alter-27100,
year={2013},
doi={10.1007/s10670-013-9453-4},
title={Alternatives to histories? : employing a local notion of modal consistency in branching theories},
number={S3},
volume={79},
issn={0165-0106},
journal={Erkenntnis},
pages={343--364},
author={Müller, Thomas}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/27100">
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
<dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<dcterms:title>Alternatives to histories? : employing a local notion of modal consistency in branching theories</dcterms:title>
<dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/27100/2/Mueller_271002.pdf"/>
<dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
<dc:contributor>Müller, Thomas</dc:contributor>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2014-03-26T08:51:23Z</dcterms:available>
<dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Branching theories are popular frameworks for modeling objective indeterminism in the form of a future of open possibilities. In such theories, the notion of a history plays a crucial role: it is both a basic ingredient in the axiomatic definition of the framework, and it is used as a parameter of truth in semantics for languages with a future tense. Furthermore, histories—complete possible courses of events—ground the notion of modal consistency: a set of events is modally con- sistent iff there is a history containing that set. We will explain these roles of histories and highlight some critical aspects having to do with the fact that histories are global and, in a relevant sense, "big" objects. The notion of modal consistency, on the other hand, has both local and global aspects. We ask in how far a local notion of modal consistency can serve as an alternative to the common uses of histories, and work out two recent approaches to alternatives to histories. Com- bining these approaches, we develop a novel semantics for branching time.</dcterms:abstract>
<dcterms:issued>2013</dcterms:issued>
<dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/27100/2/Mueller_271002.pdf"/>
<dcterms:bibliographicCitation>Erkenntnis ; 79 (2014), 3 Suppl. - S. 343-364</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:creator>Müller, Thomas</dc:creator>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2014-03-26T08:51:23Z</dc:date>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/27100"/>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>